首页> 外文期刊>Multiple Sclerosis International >The Effect of Community Exercise Interventions for People with MS Who Use Bilateral Support for Gait
【24h】

The Effect of Community Exercise Interventions for People with MS Who Use Bilateral Support for Gait

机译:社区运动干预对使用双边支持步态的MS患者的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. Mobility limitations are a key feature of MS and 25% will require the use of a walking aid 15 years after diagnosis. Few studies have specifically evaluated the effectiveness of physiotherapy and exercise interventions delivered in the community for those with significant disability.Methods. An assessor blind, block randomised, and controlled study recruited participants who required bilateral assistance for gait and who occasionally used wheelchairs for longer distances. They were randomised to 10 weeks of group physiotherapy (balance and strengthening exercises), individual physiotherapy, yoga group, or a control group.Results. Repeated measures ANOVA found significant time effects for physical component of MSIS-29v2 (f=7.993,P=0.006) and MFIS (f=8.695,P=0.004). The group × time interaction was significant for the BBS (f=4.391,P=0.006). Post hoc analysis revealed no difference between group and individual physiotherapy for BBS. There was no significant difference between groups but the 6MWT improved for individual physiotherapy (P=0.001) and MSIS-29v2 psychological score for group physiotherapy (P=0.005).Discussion. This study found that balance and strengthening exercises, delivered in the community to those with significant mobility limitations, improve balance. The effect on walking endurance and patient-reported outcomes are unclear and warrants further investigation with a larger control group with similar baseline characteristics to the intervention groups.
机译:背景。行动不便是MS的主要特征,诊断后15年,有25%的人将需要使用助行器。很少有研究专门评估社区为严重残疾者提供的理疗和运动干预措施的有效性。评估者进行了盲人,分组随机对照研究,该研究招募了需要双脚步态帮助并且偶尔使用轮椅较长距离的参与者。他们被随机分为10周的组理疗(平衡和加强锻炼),个体理疗,瑜伽组或对照组。重复测量ANOVA发现MSIS-29v2(f = 7.993,P = 0.006)和MFIS(f = 8.695,P = 0.004)的物理成分具有明显的时间效应。 BBS的组×时间交互作用显着(f = 4.391,P = 0.006)。事后分析显示,BBS的团体理疗与个人理疗没有区别。两组之间无显着差异,但个体理疗的6MWT改善了(P = 0.001),理疗的MSIS-29v2心理评分得到了改善(P = 0.005)。这项研究发现,在社区中为行动不便的人提供的平衡和加强锻炼可以改善平衡。对步行耐力和患者报告的结局的影响尚不清楚,因此有必要与具有与干预组相似的基线特征的较大对照组进行进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号