首页> 外文期刊>Meno Istorija ir Kritika >Dislocation: The Conflict of Photographic and Cinematographic Representations of War in Soviet Lithuania
【24h】

Dislocation: The Conflict of Photographic and Cinematographic Representations of War in Soviet Lithuania

机译:错位:苏联立陶宛战争中的摄影和电影摄影表现形式的冲突

获取原文
           

摘要

Summary The Cold War that shaped the societies of late modernity had penetrated everyday life with constant messages about the nuclear threat and demonstrations of military power. On the one hand, Soviet republics such as Lithuania were occupied by the enemy of Western democracies, and the nuclear threat would apply to their territory as well. On the other hand, many people secretly sided with the West. But information about the world behind the Iron Curtain was filtered ideologically. Images of Vietnam War and civil unrest in Western countries were broadcasted by the state controlled media as a counterpoint to the orderly and optimistic Soviet life idealised in chronicles and photographs. This positive image was shown to rest on the victory of the Great Patriotic War as well as October Revolution. Those events were represented by iconic monuments in the public space as well as by memorialization rituals taking place every half-year. Their visual documentation was an important part of Soviet culture. Photo journalists like Ilja Fi?eris were assigned to record the parades of May the 1st, the 9th and November the 7th. Art photographers treated such images as a tribute to authorities exchanged for a measure of artistic freedom. But in the 1980s, the memorialization rituals, the monuments and other ideological signs became the focus of “rogue” art photographers and cinematographers: Artūras Barysas-Baras, Vytautas Bal?ytis, Vitas Luckus, Alfonsas Maldutis, Algirdas ?e?kus, Remigijus Pa??sa and Gintaras Zinkevi?ius. Their ironic and reflective images worked as dislocating counter-memorials against the stale reconstructions of the past. Referring to theories of Svetlana Boym, Verónica Tello and Ariella Azoulay, the paper discusses the complicated relationships between the different memorializations of war, including the absence of the Holocaust in collective memory.
机译:总结塑造晚期现代社会的冷战已经渗透到日常生活中,不断传递着有关核威胁和军事实力示威的信息。一方面,像立陶宛这样的苏维埃共和国被西方民主国家的敌人占领,核威胁也将适用于它们的领土。另一方面,许多人暗中支持西方。但是,关于铁幕背后世界的信息在思想上已经被过滤掉了。国家控制的媒体播放了越南战争和西方国家内乱的图像,以此作为对编年史和照片中理想化的有序乐观的苏联生活的反击。这种正面形象被证明是建立在伟大卫国战争和十月革命的胜利之上的。这些活动以公共场所的标志性古迹以及每半年举行的纪念仪式为代表。他们的视觉记录是苏联文化的重要组成部分。像Ilja Fi?eris这样的图片记者被分配来记录5月1日,9日和11月7日的游行。艺术摄影师将这些图像视为对当局的致敬,换来了一定程度的艺术自由。但是在1980年代,纪念仪式,古迹和其他意识形态标志成为“流氓”艺术摄影师和电影摄影师的关注重点:阿图拉斯·巴里萨斯-巴拉斯,维陶塔斯·巴尔蒂斯,维塔斯·卢库斯,阿方萨斯·马尔杜蒂斯,阿尔吉达斯·埃库斯,雷米贾伊斯Pa?sa和Gintaras Zinkevi?ius。他们具有讽刺意味和反光的图像起到了与过去陈旧的重建抗衡的作用。参照斯维特拉娜·博伊姆(Svetlana Boym),维罗妮卡·特洛(VerónicaTello)和阿里埃拉·阿祖莱(Ariella Azoulay)的理论,本文讨论了不同战争纪念物之间的复杂关系,包括集体记忆中没有大屠杀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号