首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Vascular Medicine >Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Open Surgical and Endovascular Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection
【24h】

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Open Surgical and Endovascular Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection

机译:B型主动脉夹层开放性手术和血管内修复的倾向得分匹配分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To identify national outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissections (TBADs).Methods. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was examined from 2005 to 2008 using ICD-9 codes to identify patients with TBAD who underwent TEVAR or open surgical repair. We constructed separate propensity models for emergently and electively admitted patients and calculated mortality and complication rates for propensity score-matched cohorts of TEVAR and open repair patients.Results. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher following open repair than TEVAR (17.5% versus 10.8%,P= .045) in emergently admitted TBAD. There was no in-hospital mortality difference between open repair and TEVAR (5.6% versus 3.3%,P= .464) for elective admissions. Hospitals performing thirty or more TEVAR procedures annually had lower mortality for emergent TBAD than hospitals with fewer than thirty procedures.Conclusions. TEVAR produces better in-hospital outcomes in emergent TBAD than open repair, but further longitudinal analysis is required.
机译:目的。确定B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)的胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)的国家预后。使用ICD-9代码对2005年至2008年的全国住院患者样本数据库进行了检查,以识别接受TEVAR或开放手术修复的TBAD患者。我们为急诊和择期住院患者构建了单独的倾向模型,并计算了TEVAR和开放式修复患者的倾向评分匹配队列的死亡率和并发症发生率。急诊入院的TBAD患者经开放修补后的院内死亡率显着高于TEVAR(17.5%比10.8%,P = .045)。择期入院的开放式修复与TEVAR的院内死亡率无差异(5.6%比3.3%,P = .464)。每年执行30项或以上TEVAR程序的医院比发生少于30项程序的医院的急诊TBAD死亡率要低。与开放性修复相比,TEVAR在急诊TBAD中产生更好的院内预后,但需要进一步的纵向分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号