首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Taxonomy >The identification of the species of the ‘Spilogona contractifrons species-group’ and the ‘Spilogona nitidicauda species-group’ (Diptera, Muscidae) based on morphological and molecular analysis
【24h】

The identification of the species of the ‘Spilogona contractifrons species-group’ and the ‘Spilogona nitidicauda species-group’ (Diptera, Muscidae) based on morphological and molecular analysis

机译:基于形态学和分子分析的“ Spilogona contractifrons物种组”和“ Spilogona nitidicauda物种组”(双翅类)的种类鉴定

获取原文
           

摘要

Muscid species of the ‘ Spilogona contractifrons species-group’ ( Spilogona alticola (Malloch, 1920), S.?arctica (Zetterstedt, 1838), S.?contractifrons (Zetterstedt, 1838), S.?orthosurstyla Xue?& Tian, 1988) and of the ‘ Spilogona nitidicauda species-group’ ( S.?nitidicauda (Schnabl, 1911), S.?hissarensis Hennig, 1959, S.?imitatrix (Malloch, 1921), S.?platyfrons Sorokina, 2018) are notoriously difficult to distinguish. In this paper, their morphological features are analysed, images of the male head, frons and abdomen of all the species are given, and the male terminalia are figured. The study of extensive material has shown that all the morphologically recognised species in each of these groups are valid species. An identification key is provided for both groups of species. To confirm the morphological differences, genetic differences in the cytochrome oxidase I gene of flies of the ‘ Spilogona contractifrons species-group’ and of the ‘ Spilogona nitidicauda species-group’ were analysed. It is shown that members of both groups of species have not only distinguishing morphological characters but also fixed substitutions in the DNA sequences. Since a low interspecific polymorphism is known in the Muscidae Latreille, 1802, the revealed genetic distances confirm the existence of separate species or subspecies in each of the groups studied.
机译:``螺旋藻(Spilogona contractifrons)种组''的麝香属(Spilogona alticola(Malloch,1920),S.?arctica(Zetterstedt,1838),S.?contractifrons(Zetterstedt,1838),S.orthosurstystyla Xue?&Tian,1988 )和'Spilogona nitidicauda种组'(S.?nitidicauda(Schnabl,1911),S.?hissarensis Hennig,1959,S.?imitatrix(Malloch,1921),S.?platyfrons Sorokina,2018)是众所周知的。难以区分。本文分析了它们的形态特征,给出了所有物种的雄性头部,叶状体和腹部的图像,并绘制了雄性末端。对大量材料的研究表明,每个组中所有经形态学识别的物种都是有效物种。为两组物种都提供了一个识别码。为了确认形态学差异,分析了“螺旋藻种群”和“螺旋藻种群”果蝇的细胞色素氧化酶I基因的遗传差异。结果表明,两组物种的成员不仅具有区别的形态特征,而且在DNA序列中具有固定的取代。由于在1802年的Muscidae Latreille中已知一种低的种间多态性,因此揭示的遗传距离证实了每个研究组中存在独立的物种或亚种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号