首页> 外文期刊>Medycyna Pracy >Comparison of vocal tract discomfort scale results with objective and instrumental phoniatric parameters among teacher rehabilitees from voice disorders
【24h】

Comparison of vocal tract discomfort scale results with objective and instrumental phoniatric parameters among teacher rehabilitees from voice disorders

机译:语音障碍教师康复中声带不适量表结果与客观和器质性语音参数的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of occupational dysphonia play a major role in voice self-assessment, which is one of the elements of a comprehensive evaluation of voice disorders. The aim of the study was to assess the applicability of the Vocal Tract Discomfort (VTD) scale to monitor the effectiveness of voice rehabilitation and compare the VTD results with objective and instrumental methods of phoniatric diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The study included 55 teachers (mean age, 47.2) with occupational dysphonia. A comprehensive diagnosis took into account self-assessment by VTD scale, phoniatric examination, including laryngovideostroboscopy (LVSS) and objective measurements of the aerodynamic parameter - the maximum phonation time (MPT). After 4 months of intense rehabilitation, post-therapy examination was performed using the methods specified above. Results: After the treatment, a significant improvement was obtained in the subjective symptoms measured on a VTD scale - assessed both for the frequency (p = 0.000) and the severity (p = 0.000) subscales. Positive effects of the therapy were also observed for the parameters evaluated in the phoniatric study (p 0.01) and laryngovideostroboscopy (p 0.01). After voice therapy, there was also an improvement in the objective parameter MCF, which was about 5 seconds longer. Studies have shown that the VTD scale is characterized by high reliability - Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the preliminary test was as follows: for the frequency subscale symptoms - 0.826, and severity - 0.845; similarly high reliability was achieved in the control test, 0.908 and 0.923, respectively. Conclusions: Vocal Tract Discomfort scale can be a valuable tool for assessing voice, and can also be used to monitor the effectiveness of therapy of the occupational dysphonia. Med Pr 2013;64(2):199–206
机译:背景:职业性听音障碍的诊断和治疗程序在语音自我评估中起主要作用,这是对语音障碍进行综合评估的要素之一。这项研究的目的是评估声带不适(VTD)量表的适用性,以监测语音康复的有效性,并将VTD结果与客观和仪器诊断的语音方法进行比较。资料和方法:该研究纳入了55名职业性躁郁症教师(平均年龄47.2)。全面的诊断考虑了通过VTD量表进行的自我评估,包括喉镜下频闪检查(LVSS)在内的语音检查以及空气动力学参数-最大发声时间(MPT)的客观测量。经过4个月的激烈康复后,使用上述指定的方法进行了治疗后检查。结果:治疗后,在VTD量表上测量的主观症状得到了显着改善-评估了频率(p = 0.000)和严重性(p = 0.000)子量表。在声音研究(p <0.01)和喉镜下频闪检查(p <0.01)中评估的参数也观察到该疗法的积极效果。语音治疗后,客观参数MCF也有所改善,大约延长了5秒。研究表明,VTD量表的特点是可靠性高-初步测试中的Cronbach'sα系数如下:频率分量表症状-0.826,严重度-0.845;类似地,在对照测试中分别达到0.908和0.923的高可靠性。结论:声带不适量表可以作为评估声音的有价值的工具,也可以用于监测职业性发声障碍的治疗效果。 Med Pr 2013; 64(2):199–206

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号