首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study
【24h】

Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study

机译:非小细胞肺癌根治性放疗前系统性支气管内超声引导的纵隔分期与正电子发射断层成像在非小细胞肺癌中进行纵隔分期的综合研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Despite known limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), radiation treatment fields are generally based on PET-identified disease extent. However, no studies have examined the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT on a per-node basis in patients being considered for curative-intent radiotherapy in NSCLC. In a prospective trial, patients with NSCLC being considered for definitive thoracic radiotherapy (± systemic chemotherapy) underwent minimally invasive systematic mediastinal evaluation with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) following noninvasive staging with integrated PET-CT. Thirty patients underwent EBUS-TBNA, with TBNA performed from a mean 2.5 lymph node (LN) stations per patient (median 3, range 1–5). Discordant findings between PET-CT and EBUS-TBNA were observed in 10 patients (33%, 95% CI 19%–51%). PET-occult LN metastases were demonstrated by EBUS in 4 patients, whereas a lesser extent of mediastinal involvement, compared with FDG-PET, was demonstrated by EBUS in 6 patients, including 2 patients downstaged from cN3 to pN2. LNs upstaged by EBUS were significantly smaller than nodes downstaged by EBUS, 7.5?mm (range 7–9) versus 12?mm (range 6–21), P?=?0.005. A significant proportion of patients considered for definitive radiotherapy (+/-chemotherapy) undergoing systematic mediastinal evaluation with EBUS-TBNA in this study have an extent of mediastinal NSCLC involvement discordant with that indicated by PET-CT. Systematic EBUS-TBNA may aid in defining the extent of mediastinal involvement in NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy. Systematic EBUS-TBNA has the potential to contribute significantly to radiotherapy planning and delivery, by either identifying occult nodal metastases, or demonstrating FDG-avid LNs to be disease-free.
机译:尽管正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的纵隔分期中存在已知的局限性,但放射治疗领域通常基于PET识别的疾病范围。然而,尚无研究针对正在考虑在非小细胞肺癌中进行根治性放疗的患者逐节检查FDG-PET / CT的准确性。在一项前瞻性试验中,正在考虑将非小细胞肺癌的患者在确定性胸腔放疗(±系统化学疗法)后,采用无创分期与PET-CT进行微创系统纵隔评估,并采用支气管内超声引导经支气管穿刺针抽吸术(EBUS-TBNA)。 30名患者接受了EBUS-TBNA,每名患者平均2.5个淋巴结(LN)站进行了TBNA检查(中位数3,范围1-5)。在10例患者中观察到PET-CT与EBUS-TBNA之间存在不一致的发现(33%,95%CI 19%–51%)。 EBUS在4例患者中证实了PET隐匿性LN转移,而EBUS在6例患者中证实了纵隔累及程度较FDG-PET少,其中2例患者从cN3降级为pN2。由EBUS升级的LN明显小于由EBUS升级的LN,分别为7.5?mm(范围7–9)和12?mm(范围6–21),P≥0.005。在本研究中,考虑进行最终放疗(+/-化学疗法)并使用EBUS-TBNA进行系统纵隔评估的患者中,有相当一部分患者的纵隔NSCLC受累程度与PET-CT所表明的程度不符。系统性EBUS-TBNA可能有助于确定接受放疗的NSCLC患者的纵隔受累程度。系统性EBUS-TBNA可以通过识别隐匿性淋巴结转移或证明FDG-avid LN无病,从而对放射治疗的计划和实施做出重大贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号