首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:机器人辅助和腹腔镜与开放式前列腺癌根治术在临床局限性前列腺癌中的关系:围手术期,功能和肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes and cost of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) comparing with open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in men with clinically localized prostate cancer through all prospective comparative studies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in August 2018 using the Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies including patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were eligible for study inclusion. Cumulative analysis was conducted using Review Manager v. 5.3 software. Results: Two RCTs and 9 prospective studies were included in this systematic review. There were no significant differences between RARP/LRP and ORP in overall complication rate, major complication rate, overall positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, ≤pT2 tumor PSM rate, ≥pT3 tumor PSM rate. Moreover, RARP/LRP and ORP showed similarity in biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate at 3, 12, 24 months postoperatively. Urinary continence and erectile function at 12 months postoperatively between RARP and ORP are also comparable. RARP/LRP were associated with significantly lower estimated blood loss [mean difference (MD) ?749.67, 95% CI ?1038.52 to ?460.82, P = .001], lower transfusion rate (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.30, P .001) and less hospitalization duration (MD ?1.18, 95% CI ?2.18 to ?0.19, P = .02). And RARP/LRP required more operative time (MD 50.02, 95% CI 6.50 to 93.55, P = .02) and cost. Conclusion: RARP/LRP is associated with lower blood loss, transfusion rate and less hospitalization duration. The available data were insufficient to prove the superiority of any surgical approach in terms of postoperative complications, functional and oncologic outcomes.
机译:背景:进行系统的回顾和荟萃分析,以评估机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)或腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)与开放性根治性前列腺切除术(ORP)的围手术期,功能和肿瘤学结果以及费用通过所有前瞻性比较研究确定临床上局部的前列腺癌。方法:2018年8月,使用Pubmed,Medline,Embase和Cochrane数据库进行了全面的文献检索。只有随机对照试验(RCT)和前瞻性研究(包括具有临床局限性前列腺癌的患者)才有资格纳入研究。使用Review Manager 5.3版软件进行累积分析。结果:本系统评价包括两项RCT和9项前瞻性研究。 RARP / LRP和ORP在总并发症发生率,主要并发症发生率,总手术切缘阳性率,≤pT2肿瘤PSM率,≥pT3肿瘤PSM率方面无显着差异。此外,RARP / LRP和ORP在术后3、12、24个月的生化复发率(BCR)相似。 RARP和ORP术后12个月的尿失禁和勃起功能也相当。 RARP / LRP与估计的失血量显着降低[平均差异(MD)≥749.67,95%CI≥1038.52至460.82,P = .001],较低的输血率(OR 0.17,95%CI 0.10至0.30,P <0.001)和更少的住院时间(MD≤1.18,95%CI≤2.18至≤0.19,P = .02)。 RARP / LRP需要更多的手术时间(MD 50.02,95%CI 6.50至93.55,P = .02)和成本。结论:RARP / LRP与失血量少,输血率低和住院时间短有关。现有数据不足以证明任何手术方法在术后并发症,功能和肿瘤学结局方面的优越性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号