首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Early versus late clinical outcomes following same day discharge after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Early versus late clinical outcomes following same day discharge after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后当天出院后早期和晚期临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Nowadays 57% of the cardiologists based in the United Kingdom and 32% of the cardiologists based in Canada utilize same day discharge (SDD) following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a routine practice. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically assess early versus late clinical outcomes following SDD after elective PCI. Methods: The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, the Cochrane Central, the Resources from the United States National Library of Medicine ( www.ClinicalTrials.gov : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ) and EMBASE were carefully searched for relevant English publications which reported early versus late clinical outcomes in patients who were discharged on the same day following revascularization by PCI. Relevant clinical outcomes which were reported in the original studies were considered as the endpoints in this analysis. Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data, and RevMan 5.3 was used as the statistical software. Results: A total number of 21, 687 participants (enrollment time period from the year 1998 to the year 2015) were assigned to this analysis. When early versus late clinical outcomes were compared in patients who were discharged on the same day following elective PCI, major adverse cardiac events (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.31–1.79; P = .51), mortality (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.06–1.06; P = .06), stroke (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.72–2.94; P = .29), arrhythmia (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.64–2.63; P = .47), hematoma (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.60–1.66; P = 1.00) and major bleeding from access site (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 0.22–12.85; P = .62) were not significantly different. Post-procedural myocardial infarction (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 0.71–5.70; P = .19) and minor bleeding from access site (OR: 6.61, 95% CI: 0.86–50.66; P = .07) were also similarly manifested. However, re-hospitalization was significantly higher in those patients with late clinical outcomes (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07–0.44; P = .0002). Conclusions: In those patients who were discharged from the hospital on the same day following elective PCI, no significant difference was observed in the assessed early versus late clinical outcomes . However, late clinical outcomes resulted in a significantly higher rate of re-hospitalization . Larger studies should confirm this hypothesis.
机译:背景:如今,英国的57%的心脏病专家和加拿大的32%的心脏病专家采用择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后采用当日放电(SDD)作为常规做法。在这项分析中,我们旨在系统评估选择性PCI后SDD后早期和晚期临床结局。方法:仔细搜索在线医学文献分析和检索系统,Cochrane中心,美国国家医学图书馆的资源(www.ClinicalTrials.gov:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)和EMBASE,以查找相关的英语。出版物报道了在PCI血运重建后同一天出院的患者的早期和晚期临床结局。原始研究中报告的相关临床结局被视为该分析的终点。使用奇数比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示数据,并使用RevMan 5.3作为统计软件。结果:总共21,687名参与者(从1998年到2015年的注册时间段)被分配给该分析。当比较选择性PCI后在同一天出院的患者的早期和晚期临床结局时,主要不良心脏事件(OR:0.75,95%CI:0.31–1.79; P = .51),死亡率(OR:0.26, 95%CI:0.06-1.06; P = .06),中风(OR:1.46,95%CI:0.72-2.94; P = .29),心律失常(OR:1.30,95%CI:0.64-2.63; P = .47),血肿(OR:1.00,95%CI:0.60–1.66; P = 1.00)和进入部位的大出血(OR:1.68,95%CI:0.22-12.85; P = .62)没有显着差异。术后心肌梗死(OR:2.01,95%CI:0.71–5.70; P = .19)和从进入部位的少量出血(OR:6.61,95%CI:0.86–50.66; P = .07)也类似表现出来。然而,在那些临床结果较晚的患者中,再次住院的比例明显更高(OR:0.18,95%CI:0.07–0.44; P = .0002)。结论:在择期PCI后于同一天出院的患者中,评估的早期和晚期临床结局无显着差异。但是,晚期临床结果导致再次住院的比率明显更高。较大的研究应证实这一假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号