首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Effect of dyad training on medical students’ cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance
【24h】

Effect of dyad training on medical students’ cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance

机译:二元组训练对医学生心肺复苏性能的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We investigated the effects of dyadic training on medical students’ resuscitation performance during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training. We provided students with a 2-hour training session on CPR for simulated cardiac arrest. Student teams were split into double groups (Dyad training groups: Groups A and B) or Single Groups. All groups received 2 CPR simulation rounds. CPR simulation training began with peer demonstration for Group A, and peer observation for Group B. Then the 2 groups switched roles. Single Groups completed CPR simulation without peer observation or demonstration. Teams were then evaluated based on leadership, teamwork, and team member skills. Group B had the highest first simulation round scores overall ( P = 0.004) and in teamwork ( P = 0.001) and team member skills ( P = 0.031). Group B also had the highest second simulation round scores overall ( P < 0.001) and in leadership ( P = 0.033), teamwork ( P < 0.001), and team member skills ( P < 0.001). In the first simulation, there were no differences between Dyad training groups with those of Single Groups in overall scores, leadership scores, teamwork scores, and team member scores. In the second simulation, Dyad training groups scored higher in overall scores ( P = 0.002), leadership scores ( P = 0.044), teamwork scores ( P = 0.005), and team member scores ( P = 0.008). Dyad training groups also displayed higher improvement in overall scores ( P = 0.010) and team member scores ( P = 0.022). Dyad training was effective for CPR training. Both peer observation and demonstration for peers in dyad training can improve student resuscitation performance.
机译:我们调查了二元训练对心肺复苏(CPR)训练期间医学生复苏表现的影响。我们为学生提供了2小时的CPR训练课程,以模拟心跳骤停。学生团队分为两组(Dyad培训组:A和B组)或单组。所有组均接受了2次CPR模拟回合。 CPR模拟培训从A组的同伴演示和B组的同伴观察开始。然后,这两个组切换了角色。单个小组完成了CPR模拟,而没有同行的观察或演示。然后根据领导力,团队合作精神和团队成员的技能对团队进行评估。 B组的第一轮模拟总体得分最高(P = 0.004),在团队合作中(P = 0.001)和团队成员技能(P = 0.031)。 B组在第二轮模拟总体得分(P <0.001)和领导力(P = 0.033),团队合作(P <0.001)和团队成员技能(P <0.001)方面也最高。在第一个模拟中,Dyad培训组与单一组之间在总体得分,领导力得分,团队合作得分和团队成员得分方面没有差异。在第二个模拟中,Dyad培训组在总体得分(P = 0.002),领导力得分(P = 0.044),团队合作得分(P = 0.005)和团队成员得分(P = 0.008)上得分较高。 Dyad培训组的总体得分(P = 0.010)和团队成员得分(P = 0.022)也有较高的提高。二元组训练对CPR训练有效。对同伴进行双子座训练的同伴观察和演示都可以提高学生的复苏性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号