...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Different types of mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis with randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Different types of mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis with randomized controlled trials

机译:腹腔镜修复腹股沟疝的不同类型的网状固定:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become a valid option for repair of an inguinal hernia . Due to there are several types of mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia . The study aims to assess and compare the efficacy of different types of mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia using network meta-analysis . Methods: We will systematically search PubMed, EMBASE the Cochrane library, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database from their inception to March 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of different types of mesh fixation for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will be included. The primary outcomes are chronic groin pain, incidence risk of hernia recurrence, and complications. Risk of bias assessment of the included RCTs will be conducted using to Cochrane risk of bias tool. A network meta-analysis will be performed using WinBUGS 1.4.3 software and the result figures will be generated using R x64 3.1.2 software and STATA V.12.0 software. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) will be used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Conclusion: Our study will generate evidence of laparoscopic repair of mesh fixation for adult patients with inguinal hernia and provide suggestions for clinical practice or guideline.
机译:背景:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术已成为修复腹股沟疝的有效选择。由于腹腔镜修补腹股沟疝有几种类型的网状固定。该研究旨在通过网络荟萃分析评估和比较不同类型的网状固定术对腹股沟疝腹腔镜修复的疗效。方法:从开始到2018年3月,我们将系统搜索PubMed,EMBASE Cochrane库和中国生物医学文献数据库。将包括比较不同类型的网状固定对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是慢性腹股沟疼痛,疝气复发的发生风险和并发症。所含RCT的偏倚风险评估将使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行。将使用WinBUGS 1.4.3软件执行网络元分析,并使用R x64 3.1.2软件和STATA V.12.0软件生成结果图。建议评估,制定和评估的等级(GRADE)将用于评估证据的质量。结果:这项研究的结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上。结论:我们的研究将为成年腹股沟疝患者腹腔镜修补网状固定提供证据,并为临床实践或指南提供建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号