首页> 外文期刊>Fresenius environmental bulletin >ORGANIC FARMING AND CONSERVATION TILLAGE INFLUENCED SOIL HEALTH COMPONENT
【24h】

ORGANIC FARMING AND CONSERVATION TILLAGE INFLUENCED SOIL HEALTH COMPONENT

机译:农业耕作和保护性耕作对土壤健康的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The present article reviews the scientific literature on the influence of organic and conventional fanning as well as organic fertilizer source (plant-based vs. animal-based) on soil health. Additionally. the role of tillage practices (conscrvational vs. conventional) in soil perfonnance is studied. Research shows that organic fanning systems potentially enhanced soil health through improved soil respiration-CO: (soil health indicator), soil organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, soil water content as well as soil microorganism's (fungi, bacteria and nematodes) activity and abundance. Conversely, organic systems had lower yield compared to conventional. Organic farming sources also significant-ly affected soil health. Plant-based fcililizcrs (c.g. com and alfalfa incal) also improved soil health (respirarion-CO:). organic matter %, nutrient availability and fniit quality. But, animal-based fertilizers (e.g. fish meal, chicken manure and blood meal) significantly increased marketable >ncld compared to plant-based ones, especially, in short-run projects. Tillage practices have also an impact on soil quality variables (physical, chemical and biological properties). Conservation tillage (no-till and strip) practices improve soil penetration resistance, organic carbon, and biota biomass, density, activity and diversity. In fact, conservation tillage practices increased soil microorganism (bacteria, fungi and ncmatcxlc) activity and abundance and also available nutrients in comparison to conventional tillage. However, conscrvational tillage practices lead to higher soil compaction and greater number of rootfeeding nematodes (hannful to plant roots). Overall, organic fanning systems can successfully improve soil health but may not be the best choice for farmers whose essential short-term objective is a higher yield. Also, organic growers with a primary focus on yield should not use plant-based fertilizers (c.g. alfalfa).
机译:本文回顾了有关有机耕作和常规耕作以及有机肥料来源(基于植物和动物的肥料)对土壤健康的影响的科学文献。另外。研究了耕作方式(传统耕作与传统耕作)在土壤性能中的作用。研究表明,有机扇形系统可以通过改善土壤呼吸-CO :(土壤健康指标),土壤有机碳,阳离子交换能力,土壤含水量以及土壤微生物(真菌,细菌和线虫)的活性和丰度来改善土壤健康。相反,有机体系的收率低于常规体系。有机耕作来源也严重影响了土壤健康。植物性纤毛虫(例如com和紫花苜蓿)也改善了土壤健康(respirarion-CO :)。有机质百分比,养分利用率和食品质量。但是,与基于植物的肥料相比,基于动物的肥料(例如鱼粉,鸡粪和血粉)显着增加了可销售性,尤其是在短期项目中。耕作方式也对土壤质量变量(物理,化学和生物特性)产生影响。保护性耕作(免耕和剥离)做法可提高土壤渗透性,有机碳和生物量,密度,活性和多样性。实际上,与传统耕作相比,保护性耕作增加了土壤微生物(细菌,真菌和ncmatcxlc)的活性和丰度,并增加了养分。但是,传统的耕作方式导致更高的土壤压实度和更多的根系饲喂线虫(对植物根系有益)。总体而言,有机耕作系统可以成功改善土壤健康状况,但对于短期目标是提高单产的农民来说,可能不是最佳选择。同样,主要关注产量的有机种植者不应使用植物肥料(例如苜蓿)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号