首页> 外文期刊>Medical principles and practice: international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre >Comparison of Three Tracheal Intubation Techniques in Thyroid Tumor Patients with a Difficult Airway: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Comparison of Three Tracheal Intubation Techniques in Thyroid Tumor Patients with a Difficult Airway: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:困难气道甲状腺肿瘤患者三种气管插管技术的比较:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the Shikani optical stylet (SOS) and GlideScope video laryngoscope (GVL) for tracheal intubation of thyroid tumor patients with a difficult airway. Subjects and Methods: One hundred and twenty thyroid tumor patients with a difficult airway, who were undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia, were enrolled in the study. They were randomly allocated to 3 groups (n = 40 each) who underwent direct laryngoscopy (DL), SOS or GVL. The outcomes recorded were time to intubation, first-attempt success rate, mean artery pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and incidence of complications. Results: The mean time to intubation in the SOS group (group S; 42.4 ± 24.1 s) and the GLV group (group G; 29.8 ± 22.3 s) was significantly less than that in the DL group (group D) (68.8 ± 26.6 s). The first-attempt success rate in group S (90.0%) and group G (97.5%) was significantly higher than that in group D (75.0%; all p < 0.05). The HR and MAP at 1 min after intubation were lowest in group S (76.4 ± 9.2 beats/min and 12.9 ± 1.1 kPa), followed by group G (79.9 ± 9.3 beats/min and 13.0 ± 0.9 kPa) and then group D (90.4 ± 8.1 beats/min and 16.6 ± 1.2 kPa). The difference was statistically significant (all p < 0.05). The incidence of lip or mucosal trauma was lowest in group S, followed by group G and then group D. Conclusion: The SOS and the GLV had advantages over the DL in the management of thyroid tumor patients with a difficult airway in terms of a shorter time to intubation, a higher first-attempt success rate and a reduced incidence of complications. Thus, a rational choice of one of these techniques may be better for the perioperative safety of thyroid tumor patients with a difficult airway.
机译:目的:探讨Shikani光学探针(SOS)和GlideScope视频喉镜(GVL)在气道困难的甲状腺肿瘤患者气管插管中的有效性。对象和方法:纳入了120例患有气道困难的甲状腺肿瘤患者,他们正在接受需要全身麻醉的择期手术。将他们随机分为3组(每组40例),分别接受直接喉镜检查(DL),SOS或GVL。记录的结果为插管时间,首次尝试成功率,平均动脉压(MAP),心率(HR)和并发症发生率。结果:SOS组(S组; 42.4±24.1 s)和GLV组(G组; 29.8±22.3 s)的平均插管时间明显少于DL组(D组)(68.8±26.6) s)。 S组(90.0%)和G组(97.5%)的首次尝试成功率显着高于D组(75.0%;所有p <0.05)。插管后1分钟的HR和MAP最低,S组(76.4±9.2次/分钟和12.9±1.1 kPa),其次是G组(79.9±9.3次/分钟和13.0±0.9 kPa),然后是D组( 90.4±8.1拍/分钟和16.6±1.2 kPa)。差异具有统计学意义(所有p <0.05)。在S组中,唇部或粘膜创伤的发生率最低,其次是G组,然后是D组。结论:在呼吸道困难的甲状腺肿瘤患者中,SOS和GLV优于DL插管时间短,首次尝试成功率更高,并发症发生率更低。因此,对于呼吸道困难的甲状腺肿瘤患者,合理选择这些技术中的一种可能会更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号