...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Sciences >Patterns of Glycemic Variability During a Diabetes Self-Management Educational Program
【24h】

Patterns of Glycemic Variability During a Diabetes Self-Management Educational Program

机译:糖尿病自我管理教育计划中血糖变异性的模式

获取原文

摘要

Background: Variations in blood glucose levels over a given time interval is termed as glycemic variability (GV). Higher GV is associated with higher diabetes-related complications. The current study was done with the aim of detecting the sensitivity of various GV indices among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus of different glycemic control status. Methods: We performed a longitudinal study among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were participating in a two-week diabetes self-management education (DSME) program. Participants were categorized by their HbA1c as poor (≥8%), acceptable (7%–8%), and optimal control (7%). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors recorded interstitial glucose every 15 min from day 1. The evaluated GV measures include standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), continuous overlapping net glycemic action (CONGA), mean of daily difference for inter-day variation (MODD), high blood glucose index (HBGI), and low blood glucose index (LBGI). Results: A total of 41 study participants with 46347 CGM values were available for analysis. Of 41 participants, 20 (48.7%) were in the poor, 10 (24.3%) in the acceptable, and 11 (26.8%) in the optimal control group. The GV indices (SD; CV; MODD; MAGE; CONGA; HBGI) of poorly controlled (77.43; 38.02; 45.82; 216.63; 14.10; 16.62) were higher than acceptable (50.02; 39.32; 30.79; 138.01; 8.87; 5.56) and optimal (34.15; 29.46; 24.56; 126.15; 8.67; 3.13) control group. Glycemic variability was reduced in the poorly and acceptably controlled groups by the end of the 2-week period. There was a rise in LBGI in the optimally controlled group, indicating pitfalls of tight glycemic control. Conclusion: Indices of glycemic variability are useful complements, and changes in it can be demonstrated within short periods.
机译:背景:给定时间间隔内血糖水平的变化称为血糖变异性(GV)。较高的GV与较高的糖尿病相关并发症相关。当前的研究旨在检测具有不同血糖控制状态的2型糖尿病患者中各种GV指数的敏感性。方法:我们对参加为期两周的糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)计划的2型糖尿病(T2DM)个体进行了纵向研究。参与者按其HbA1c分为不良(≥8%),可接受(7%–8%)和最佳控制(<7%)。从第1天起,连续血糖监测(CGM)传感器每15分钟记录一次组织葡萄糖。评估的GV度量包括标准差(SD),变异系数(CV),平均血糖波动幅度(MAGE),连续重叠的净血糖作用( CONGA),即日间变化(MODD),高血糖指数(HBGI)和低血糖指数(LBGI)的每日差异的平均值。结果:共有41名研究参与者具有46347 CGM值可供分析。在41名参与者中,有20名(48.7%)位于贫困者中,有10名(24.3%)位于可接受范围内,最佳对照组有11名(26.8%)。控制不佳(77.43; 38.02; 45.82; 216.63; 14.10; 16.62)的GV指数(SD; CV; MODD; MAGE; CONGA; HBGI)高于可接受的(50.02; 39.32; 30.79; 138.01; 8.87; 5.56)和最佳(34.15; 29.46; 24.56; 126.15; 8.67; 3.13)对照组。到2周时结束时,控制较差且可接受的组的血糖变异性降低。最佳对照组的LBGI升高,表明严格的血糖控制存在陷阱。结论:血糖变异性指标是有用的补充,并且可以在短期内证明其变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号