...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Probing for Intentions: Why Clocks Do Not Provide the Only Measurement of Time
【24h】

Probing for Intentions: Why Clocks Do Not Provide the Only Measurement of Time

机译:探寻意图:为什么时钟不提供时间的唯一度量

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Having an intention to act is commonly operationalized as the moment at which awareness of an urge or decision to act arises. Measuring this moment has been challenging due to the dependence on first-person reports of subjective experience rather than objective behavioral or neural measurements. Commonly, this challenge is met using (variants of) Libet's clock method. In 2008, Matsuhashi and Hallett published a novel probing strategy as an alternative to the clock method. We believe their probe method could provide a valuable addition to the clock method because: it measures the timing of an intention in real-time, it can be combined with additional (tactile, visual or auditory) stimuli to create a more ecologically valid experimental context, and it allows the measurement of the point of no return. Yet to this date, the probe method has not been applied widely - possibly due to concerns about the effects that the probes might have on the intention and/or action preparation processes. To address these concerns, a 2 × 2 within-subject design is tested. In this design, two variables are manipulated: (1) the requirement of an introspection report and (2) the presence of an auditory probe. Three observables are measured that provide information about the timing of an intention to act: (1) awareness reports of the subjective experience of having an intention, (2) neural preparatory activity for action, and (3) behavioral data of the performed actions. The presence of probes was found to speed up mean action times by roughly 300 ms, but did not alter the neural preparation for action. The requirement of an introspection report did influence brain signals: reducing the amplitude of the readiness potential and increasing the desynchronization in the alpha and beta bands over the motor cortex prior to action onset. By discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the probe method compared to the clock method, we hope to demonstrate its added value and promote its use in future research.
机译:采取行动的意图通常是在人们意识到采取行动的冲动或决定的那一刻开始运作的。由于依赖于主观经验的第一人称报告而不是客观的行为或神经测量,因此测量此刻具有挑战性。通常,使用(多种)Libet的时钟方法可以应对这一挑战。 2008年,Matsuhashi和Hallett发表了一种新颖的探测策略,以替代时钟方法。我们认为,他们的探测方法可以为时钟方法提供有价值的补充,因为:它可以实时测量意图的时机,可以与其他(触觉,视觉或听觉)刺激相结合,以创建更具生态学意义的实验环境,它可以测量不返回点。迄今为止,探针方法尚未得到广泛应用-可能是由于担心探针可能对意图和/或动作准备过程产生影响。为了解决这些问题,测试了2×2的受试者内部设计。在此设计中,操纵了两个变量:(1)内省报告的要求和(2)听觉探针的存在。测量了三个可观察值,它们提供了有关采取行动意图的时间的信息:(1)有意图的主观体验的意识报告;(2)行动的神经准备活动;以及(3)所执行行动的行为数据。发现探针的存在可将平均动作时间缩短大约300毫秒,但不会改变动作的神经准备。内省报告的要求确实影响了大脑信号:在行动开始之前,降低了准备就绪电位的幅度,并增加了运动皮层上α和β谱带的失步。通过讨论探针方法与时钟方法相比的优缺点,我们希望证明其附加值并促进其在未来的研究中的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号