首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Comparison of the Working Memory Load in N-Back and Working Memory Span Tasks by Means of EEG Frequency Band Power and P300 Amplitude
【24h】

Comparison of the Working Memory Load in N-Back and Working Memory Span Tasks by Means of EEG Frequency Band Power and P300 Amplitude

机译:通过EEG频带功率和P300幅度比较N向后和工作记忆跨度任务中的工作记忆负荷

获取原文
       

摘要

According to theoretical accounts, both, N-back and complex span tasks mainly require working memory (WM) processing. In contrast, simple span tasks conceptually mainly require WM storage. Thus, conceptually, an N-back task and a complex span task share more commonalities as compared to a simple span task. In the current study, we compared an N-back task, a complex operation span task (Ospan), and a simple digit span task (Dspan) by means of typical WM load-related measures of the Electroencephalogram (EEG) like the parietal alpha and beta frequency band power, the frontal theta frequency band power, and the P300 amplitude, to examine whether these tasks would show commonalities or differences in WM processing-load. We expected that increasing WM-load would generally lead to a decreased alpha and beta frequency band power, an increased theta frequency band power, and a decreased P300 amplitude. Yet, based on the conceptual considerations, we hypothesized that the outcomes of these measures would be more comparable between the N-back and the Ospan as compared to the Dspan. Our hypotheses were partly confirmed. The N-back and the Ospan showed timely more prolonged alpha frequency band power effects as compared to the Dspan. This might indicate higher demands on WM processing in the former two tasks. The theta frequency band power and the P300 amplitude were most pronounced in the N-back task as compared to both span tasks. This might indicate specific demands on cognitive control in the N-back task. Additionally, we observed that behavioral performance measures correlated with changes in EEG alpha power of the N-back and the Ospan, yet not of the Dspan. Taken together, the hypothesized conceptual commonalities between the N-back task and the Ospan (and, for the Dspan, differences) were only partly confirmed by the electrophysiological WM load-related measures, indicating a potential need for reconsidering the theoretical accounts on WM tasks and the value of a closer link to electrophysiological research herein.
机译:从理论上讲,N向后和复杂跨度任务都主要需要工作内存(WM)处理。相反,从概念上讲,简单的跨度任务主要需要WM存储。因此,从概念上讲,与简单跨度任务相比,N向后任务和复杂跨度任务共享更多共性。在当前的研究中,我们通过脑电图(EEG)的典型WM负荷相关测量(如顶叶α)比较了N向后任务,复杂的操作跨度任务(Ospan)和简单的数字跨度任务(Dspan)。和β频段功率,额角theta频段功率以及P300幅度,以检查这些任务在WM处理负载方面是否表现出共性或差异。我们预期增加的WM负载通常会导致α和β频段功率减小,θ频段功率增大以及P300幅度减小。然而,基于概念上的考虑,我们假设与Dspan相比,这些措施的结果在N-back和Ospan之间更具可比性。我们的假设得到了部分证实。与Dspan相比,N后背和Ospan表现出及时,更长时间的α频段功率效应。这可能表明在前两个任务中对WM处理有更高的要求。与两个跨度任务相比,在N向后任务中,θ频段功率和P300幅度最明显。这可能表明在N后背任务中对认知控制的特定要求。此外,我们观察到,行为表现指标与N背和Ospan的EEGα功率变化相关,而与Dspan的EEGα功率变化无关。两者合计,N背任务和Ospan之间的假设的概念共性(对于Dspan,差异)仅部分由电生理WM负荷相关措施所证实,表明可能需要重新考虑WM任务的理论解释以及与本文电生理学研究更紧密联系的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号