首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Reading Aloud and Solving Simple Arithmetic Calculation Intervention (Learning Therapy) Improves Inhibition, Verbal Episodic Memory, Focus Attention and Processing Speed in Healthy Elderly People: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Reading Aloud and Solving Simple Arithmetic Calculation Intervention (Learning Therapy) Improves Inhibition, Verbal Episodic Memory, Focus Attention and Processing Speed in Healthy Elderly People: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:朗读并解决简单的算术计算干预(学习疗法)可改善健康老年人的抑制力,口头情节记忆,注意力集中和处理速度:来自随机对照试验的证据

获取原文
       

摘要

Background : Previous reports have described that simple cognitive training using reading aloud and solving simple arithmetic calculations, so-called “learning therapy”, can improve executive functions and processing speed in the older adults. Nevertheless, it is not well-known whether learning therapy improve a wide range of cognitive functions or not. We investigated the beneficial effects of learning therapy on various cognitive functions in healthy older adults. Methods : We used a single-blinded intervention with two groups (learning therapy group: LT and waiting list control group: WL). Sixty-four elderly were randomly assigned to LT or WL. In LT, participants performed reading Japanese aloud and solving simple calculations training tasks for 6 months. WL did not participate in the intervention. We measured several cognitive functions before and after 6 months intervention periods. Results : Compared to WL, results revealed that LT improved inhibition performance in executive functions (Stroop: LT (Mean = 3.88) vs. WL (Mean = 1.22), adjusted p = 0.013 and reverse Stroop LT (Mean = 3.22) vs. WL (Mean = 1.59), adjusted p = 0.015), verbal episodic memory (Logical Memory (LM): LT (Mean = 4.59) vs. WL (Mean = 2.47), adjusted p = 0.015), focus attention (D-CAT: LT (Mean = 2.09) vs. WL (Mean = ?0.59), adjusted p = 0.010) and processing speed compared to the WL control group (digit symbol coding: LT (Mean = 5.00) vs. WL (Mean = 1.13), adjusted p = 0.015 and Symbol Search (SS): LT (Mean = 3.47) vs. WL (Mean = 1.81), adjusted p = 0.014). Discussion : This randomized controlled trial (RCT) can be showed the benefit of LT on inhibition of executive functions, verbal episodic memory, focus attention and processing speed in healthy elderly people. Our results were discussed under overlapping hypothesis.
机译:背景:先前的报道描述了通过朗读和解决简单的算术运算的简单认知训练,即所谓的“学习疗法”,可以改善老年人的执行功能和处理速度。然而,学习疗法能否改善广泛的认知功能尚不为人所知。我们调查了学习疗法对健康老年人的各种认知功能的有益作用。方法:我们采用了单盲干预,分为两组(学习治疗组:LT和候补对照组:WL)。 64名老年人被随机分配为LT或WL。在LT中,参与者进行了6个月的朗读日语和解决简单的计算训练任务。 WL没有参与干预。我们在6个月的干预期前后测量了几种认知功能。结果:与WL相比,结果显示LT改善了执行功能的抑制性能(Stroop:LT(平均值= 3.88)对WL(平均值= 1.22),调整后的p = 0.013和反向Stroop LT(平均值= 3.22)对WL)。 (平均值= 1.59),调整后的p = 0.015),言语情节记忆(逻辑记忆(LM):LT(平均值= 4.59)与WL(平均值= 2.47),调整后p = 0.015),注意力集中(D-CAT: LT(平均值= 2.09)与WL(平均值= 0.59),调整后的p = 0.010)和处理速度与WL对照组相比(数字符号编码:LT(平均值= 5.00)与WL(平均值= 1.13),调整后的p = 0.015和符号搜索(SS):LT(平均值= 3.47)与WL(平均值= 1.81),调整后的p = 0.014)。讨论:这项随机对照试验(RCT)可以证明LT对健康老年人抑制执行功能,口头情节记忆,注意力集中和处理速度的益处。我们的结果在重叠假设下进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号