...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Introduction to the special research topic on the neurobiology of emotion-cognition interactions
【24h】

Introduction to the special research topic on the neurobiology of emotion-cognition interactions

机译:情绪-认知相互作用的神经生物学专题研究简介

获取原文
           

摘要

Recent years have witnessed an explosion of interest focused on the interplay of emotion and cognition (Pessoa, 2013 ; Braver et al., 2014 ; Dolcos and Denkova, 2014 ). The goal of our Special Research Topic was to survey recent advances in understanding how emotional and cognitive processes interact, how they are integrated in the brain, and the implications for understanding the mind and its disorders. Investigators from across North America, Israel, and Europe contributed 19 original empirical reports as well as 15 commentaries and theoretical reviews. Their work encompasses a broad spectrum of populations and showcases a wide variety of paradigms, measures, analytic strategies, and conceptual approaches. Already (August 2014), the 34 contributions to this Special Topic have been viewed on the Frontiers website more than 70,000 times, shared or posted to social media networks more than 16,000 times, and cited nearly 90 times. While reading, posting, sharing, and citing are undoubtedly helpful, active debate provides a more direct means of sharpening constructs, clarifying boundary conditions, articulating unspoken assumptions, identifying soft spots in the evidentiary record, and refining models. We agree with Kenrick and Funder's suggestion that, “science best progresses through multiple and mutually critical attempts to understand the same problem. When camps with… opposing sets of biases manage to come to some level of agreement, we may be more confident of the validity of the conclusions that are agreed upon” (Kenrick and Funder, 1988 , p. 32). In this regard, we were pleased to see Proudfit (Proudfit et al., 2013 ) and Moser (Moser et al., 2013 ) vigorously debate the integration of anxiety and cognitive control. The research embodied in this Special Research Topic underscores the tremendous progress made in our understanding of emotion-cognition interactions. In particular, this work demonstrates that emotional cues and states can profoundly influence key elements of cognition, including attention (Holtmann et al., 2013 ; Kessel et al., 2013 ; Mchugo et al., 2013 ; Mohanty and Sussman, 2013 ; Morriss et al., 2013 ; Peers et al., 2013 ; Stollstorff et al., 2013 ), working memory (Clarke and Johnstone, 2013 ; Iordan et al., 2013 ; Robinson et al., 2013b ; Stout et al., 2013 ; Vytal et al., 2013 ), cognitive control (Kalanthroff et al., 2013 ; Proudfit et al., 2013 ; Robinson et al., 2013a ), reinforcement learning (Berghorst et al., 2013 ), and various kinds of mood-congruent information processing (van Dessel and Vogt, 2012 ; Harle et al., 2013 ; Schick et al., 2013 ). Several contributors provided evidence that mood can have enduring consequences for cognition (Morriss et al., 2013 ; Vaisvaser et al., 2013 ), perhaps reflecting the comparatively slow dynamics of catecholamine and hormonal neurochemistry (Sacher et al., 2013 ; Shansky and Lipps, 2013 ). These and other molecular pathways may also help to explain the impact of emotional traits on cognition (Berggren et al., 2013 ; Kessel et al., 2013 ; Moser et al., 2013 ; Proudfit et al., 2013 ). A number of contributors provided exciting new evidence that circuits involved in attention, executive control, and working memory play a central role in emotion and emotion regulation (Aue et al., 2013 ; Clarke and Johnstone, 2013 ; Iordan et al., 2013 ; Peers et al., 2013 ; Rolls, 2013 ; Sheppes and Levin, 2013 ; Stollstorff et al., 2013 ). Several contributors provided evidence that putatively emotional and cognitive regions can influence one another via complex webs of connections in ways that jointly contribute to adaptive and maladaptive behavior (John et al., 2013 ; Morrison et al., 2013 ; Rolls, 2013 ). Taken together, this research suggests that emotion and cognition are deeply interwoven in the fabric of the brain (Dreisbach and Fischer, 2012 ; Crocker et al., 2013 ; Mcdermott et al., 2013 ; Moser et al., 2013 ; Proudfit et al., 2013 ; Warren et al., 2013 ). Despite this progress, a number of important challenges remain. We address these challenges in more detail in the accompanying review (Okon-Singer et al., 2015 ). Future work aimed at developing a deeper understanding of the interplay of emotion and cognition is a matter of practical as well as theoretical importance. Many of the most common, costly, and challenging to treat neuropsychiatric disorders—anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, substance abuse, chronic pain, autism, and so on—involve prominent disturbances of both cognition and emotion (Millan, 2013 ), suggesting that they can be conceptualized as disorders of the emotional-cognitive brain (Shackman et al., in press ). These disorders impose a larger burden on public health and the global economy than either cancer or cardiovascular disease (Collins et al., 2011 ; Diluca and Olesen, 2014 ; Whiteford, 2014 ), underscoring the importance of accelerating efforts to understand the neural systems underlying the interaction and the integra
机译:近年来,目睹了人们对情感与认知之间相互作用的兴趣激增(Pessoa,2013; Braver等,2014; Dolcos和Denkova,2014)。我们特殊研究主题的目的是调查最近在理解情绪和认知过程如何相互作用,如何在大脑中整合以及对理解心理及其障碍的含义方面的最新进展。来自北美,以色列和欧洲的研究人员提供了19篇原始经验报告以及15篇评论和理论评论。他们的工作涵盖了广泛的人群,并展示了各种各样的范式,度量,分析策略和概念方法。截至2014年8月,已经在Frontiers网站上浏览了该特殊主题的34篇文章,超过70,000次,共享或发布到社交媒体网络的次数超过16,000次,被引用近90次。虽然阅读,发布,共享和引用无疑是有帮助的,但积极的辩论提供了一种更直接的手段,可以用来完善结构,澄清边界条件,明确表达假设,在证据记录中确定软点并完善模型。我们同意Kenrick和Funder的建议,即“科学最好的进步是通过多次和相互批评的尝试来理解同一问题。当具有……对立偏见的阵营设法达成某种程度的共识时,我们可能会对所达成结论的有效性更有信心”(Kenrick and Funder,1988,p.32)。在这方面,我们很高兴看到Proudfit(Proudfit等,2013)和Moser(Moser等,2013)对焦虑与认知控制的融合进行了激烈的辩论。本专题研究中体现的研究强调了我们对情感-认知互动的理解所取得的巨大进步。尤其是,这项工作表明情感线索和状态可以深刻影响认知的关键要素,包括注意力(Holtmann等人,2013; Kessel等人,2013; Mchugo等人,2013; Mohanty和Sussman,2013; Morriss等人,2013; Peers等人,2013; Stollstorff等人,2013),工作记忆(Clarke和Johnstone,2013; Iordan等人,2013; Robinson等人,2013b; Stout等人,2013) ; Vytal等,2013),认知控制(Kalanthroff等,2013; Proudfit等,2013; Robinson等,2013a),强化学习(Berghorst等,2013)和各种情绪一致的信息处理(van Dessel和Vogt,2012; Harle等,2013; Schick等,2013)。一些贡献者提供了证据,表明情绪可能对认知产生持久的影响(Morriss等,2013; Vaisvaser等,2013),这可能反映了儿茶酚胺和激素神经化学的相对较慢的动力学(Sacher等,2013; Shansky和Lipps)。 ,2013年)。这些和其他分子途径也可能有助于解释情绪特征对认知的影响(Berggren等,2013; Kessel等,2013; Moser等,2013; Proudfit等,2013)。许多贡献者提供了令人兴奋的新证据,表明参与注意力,执行控制和工作记忆的回路在情绪和情绪调节中起着核心作用(Aue等人,2013; Clarke和Johnstone,2013; Iordan等人,2013; Awe等,2013)。 Peers等,2013; Rolls,2013; Sheppes和Levin,2013; Stollstorff等,2013)。几个贡献者提供了证据,证明假定的情绪和认知区域可以通过复杂的联系网络以共同促成适应性和适应不良行为的方式相互影响(John等,2013; Morrison等,2013; Rolls,2013)。两者合计,这项研究表明情感和认知在大脑的结构中是深深交织的(Dreisbach和Fischer,2012; Crocker等人,2013; Mcdermott等人,2013; Moser等人,2013; Proudfit等人,2013;沃伦(Warren)等人,2013)。尽管取得了这一进展,但仍然存在许多重要挑战。我们将在随附的评论中更详细地应对这些挑战(Okon-Singer等,2015)。旨在加深对情感与认知相互作用的未来工作,既具有实践意义,也具有理论重要性。治疗神经精神疾病(焦虑,抑郁,精神分裂症,药物滥用,慢性疼痛,自闭症等)的许多最常见,昂贵且具有挑战性的方法都涉及认知和情感方面的显着障碍(Millan,2013年),表明它们可以被概念化为情绪认知大脑的疾病(Shackman等人,印刷中)。与癌症或心血管疾病相比,这些疾病给公共健康和全球经济带来的负担更大(Collins等,2011; Diluca和Olesen,2014; Whiteford,2014),强调了加速理解基础神经系统的重要性。互动与整合

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号