...
首页> 外文期刊>MDM Policy & Practice >Panel Size, Office Visits, and Care Coordination Events: A New Workload Estimation Methodology Based on Patient Longitudinal Event Histories:
【24h】

Panel Size, Office Visits, and Care Coordination Events: A New Workload Estimation Methodology Based on Patient Longitudinal Event Histories:

机译:小组成员人数,上门拜访和护理协调活动:基于患者纵向事件历史的新工作量估算方法:

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. Panel size, or the number of patients a primary care physician (PCP) and her care team can feasibly manage as part of a practice, remains a vital question in primary care. Objective. To Illustrate a new methodology for quantifying two types of workload associated with a panel size: 1) the PCP weekly office visit distribution and 2) the weekly distribution of non-PCP events (subspecialty visits, emergency room visits, hospitalizations) that potentially require non–face-to-face coordination. Methods. We assemble granular individual-level histories of events in the health system using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from 2011. Using the date on which each event occurred, we create weekly utilization estimates as a function of panel size for the general population and Medicare patients. Results. A PCP with a panel of 2,000 adults approximately representative of the US population can expect to have 93.54 office visits on average each week. A simple model quantifying demand–capacity mismatch suggests that a PCP with a weekly capacity of 80 to 90 appointments will struggle to satisfy this office-visit demand in a timely manner. Furthermore, each week the PCP can expect the same panel to have 9.08 visits to the emergency room, 4.69 hospital inpatient events, and 131.29 office-based visits to non–primary care subspecialists; these events contribute to the non–face-to-face coordination workload, increasing the probability of an overburdened workweek. Both PCP office visit and coordination events are highly concentrated in less than 200 individuals (10% of the 2,000). Conclusion. Patient-level longitudinal event histories can be retrospectively assembled to quantify patterns of face-to-face office visits and coordination workload associated with a primary care panel.
机译:背景。小组规模或初级保健医师(PCP)和她的护理团队可以作为实践的一部分切实管理的患者数量,仍然是初级保健中的重要问题。目的。为了说明一种新的方法来量化与小组人数相关的两种类型的工作量:1)PCP每周办公室就诊分布和2)非PCP事件(亚专科就诊,急诊室就诊,住院)的每周分布,这些事件可能需要–面对面的协调。方法。我们使用2011年以来的“医疗支出面板调查”来汇总卫生系统中个人事件的细粒度历史记录。使用每个事件发生的日期,我们将每周使用率估算值作为总人口和Medicare患者面板大小的函数。结果。大约有2000名成年人组成的PCP小组代表美国人口,他们平均每周希望进行93.54次办公室访问。一个简单的量化需求-能力错配的模型表明,每周工作量为80到90个任命的PCP将难以及时满足此办公室访问需求。此外,PCP每周可以期望同一小组对急诊室进行9.08次就诊,4.69次医院住院事件以及对非基层医疗专业人士进行131.29次基于办公室的就诊;这些事件增加了非面对面的协调工作量,增加了每周工作负担过重的可能性。 PCP的办公室访问和协调活动都高度集中在不到200个人中(不到2,000人的10%)。结论。可以回顾性地汇总患者级别的纵向事件历史记录,以量化与初级保健小组相关的面对面就诊和协调工作量的模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号