In this paper, we are interested in argumentative dialogues, we continue the approach introduced by Lecomte et Quatrini [2010], who proposed a formalization of dialogues within the framework of Ludics. We illustrate our proposal in two very different cases: the controversies exemplifying Schopenhauer’s stratagems in [Schopenhauer 1830] and an adjudication dialogue studied by Prakken [2008].
展开▼
机译:在本文中,我们对辩论式对话很感兴趣,我们继续采用Lecomte et Quatrini [2010]提出的方法,后者提出在Ludics框架内将对话形式化。我们在两个截然不同的案例中说明了我们的建议:在[Schopenhauer 1830]中体现叔本华战略的争议以及Prakken [2008]研究的裁决对话。
展开▼