...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Assessment of Image Quality in Digital Radiographs Submitted for Hip Dysplasia Screening
【24h】

Assessment of Image Quality in Digital Radiographs Submitted for Hip Dysplasia Screening

机译:髋关节发育不良筛查数字X线照片中的图像质量评估

获取原文

摘要

Digital radiography is widely seen to be forgiving of poor exposure technique and to provide consistent high quality diagnostic images. Optimal quality images are however not universal sub-optimal images are encountered. Evaluators on hip dysplasia schemes encounter images from multiple practices produced on equipment from multiple manufacturers. For images submitted to the Danish Kennel Club for hip dysplasia screening, a range of quality is seen and the evaluators are of the impression that variations in image quality area associated with particular equipment. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that there is an association between image quality in digital radiography and the manufacturer of the detector equipment, and to demonstrate the applicability of visual grading analysis (VGA) for image quality evaluation in veterinary practice. Data from 14,663 digital images submitted to the Danish Kennel Club was used to generate the hypothesis that there is an association between detector manufacturer and image quality and to create groups for VGA. Image quality in a subset of 90 images randomly chosen from 6 manufacturers was characterized using VGA and the results used to test for an association between image quality and system manufacturer. The range of possible scores in the VGA was -2 to +2 (higher scores are better). The range of the VGA scores for the images in the low image quality group (n = 45) was -1.73 to +0.67, (median -1.2). Images in the high image quality group (n=44) ranged from -1.52 to +0.53, (median -0.53). This difference was statistically significant ($p0.001$). The study shows an association between VGA scores of image quality and detector manufacturer. Possible causes may be that imaging hardware and/or software are not equal in terms of quality, that the level of support sought and given differs between systems, or a combination of the two. Clinicians purchasing equipment should be mindful that image quality can differ across systems. VGA is practical for veterinarians to compare image quality between systems or within a system over time.
机译:人们普遍认为数字X射线摄影技术可以接受不良的曝光技术,并提供一致的高质量诊断图像。然而,最佳质量图像不是通用的次优图像。髋关节发育不良计划的评估人员会遇到来自多家制造商的设备上的多种实践产生的图像。对于提交给丹麦养犬俱乐部进行髋关节发育不良筛查的图像,可以看到一系列质量,评估人员的印象是图像质量区域的变化与特定设备有关。进行这项研究是为了检验以下假设:数字射线照相的图像质量与检测器设备的制造商之间存在关联,并证明视觉分级分析(VGA)在兽医实践中用于图像质量评估的适用性。来自提交给丹麦养犬俱乐部的14,663张数字图像的数据被用于生成这样的假设:检测器制造商与图像质量之间存在关联,并创建VGA组。使用VGA对从6家制造商中随机选择的90张图像的子集中的图像质量进行了表征,并将结果用于测试图像质量与系统制造商之间的关联。 VGA中可能的分数范围是-2到+2(分数越高越好)。低图像质量组(n = 45)中图像的VGA得分范围为-1.73至+0.67(中位数-1.2)。高图像质量组(n = 44)中的图像范围从-1.52到+0.53(中位数-0.53)。这种差异具有统计学意义($ p <0.001 $)。研究表明,VGA图像质量得分与检测器制造商之间存在关联。可能的原因可能是成像硬件和/或软件在质量方面不相等,系统之间寻求的和给予的支持水平不同或两者的结合。购买设备的临床医生应注意,各个系统的图像质量可能会有所不同。 VGA对于兽医比较系统之间或系统内一段时间内的图像质量非常实用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号