首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >The Changing Legal Status of Cats in Australia: From Friend of the Settlers, to Enemy of the Rabbit, and now a Threat to Biodiversity and Biosecurity Risk
【24h】

The Changing Legal Status of Cats in Australia: From Friend of the Settlers, to Enemy of the Rabbit, and now a Threat to Biodiversity and Biosecurity Risk

机译:澳大利亚猫的法律地位在不断变化:从定居者之友到兔子的敌人,现在是对生物多样性和生物安全风险的威胁

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In NSW, free-roaming cats are regarded as one the biggest threats to biodiversity. Yet, at one stage they were classified as “the enemy of the rabbit” and were protected and released in their thousands. The purpose of this article is to examine the changing status of cats in Australia, demonstrating that regulation frequently depends on a narrow set of values based on the usefulness of cats at a given point in time. By the late twentieth century, the status of free-roaming cats had changed from enemy of the rabbit, to threat to biodiversity and then in the twenty-first century, to a risk to biosecurity. Once the status of cats changed from enemy of the rabbit, management practices followed historically-driven pathways that rely on lethal methods, which do not necessarily prioritize efficacy, animal wellbeing, or changing community outlooks. This is reflected in current practice, which gives scant regard to non-lethal processes, such as Trap-Neuter-Release, and in some cases makes the feeding and release of free-roaming cats, illegal. This article argues that regulatory preferences for employing lethal methods, now occur in a society which increasingly questions the efficacy of these measures, as well as the very need to kill. While TNR is unlikely to provide a complete solution to the problem of free-roaming cats in Australia, given the success of TNR among community groups, accompanied by changing societal perspectives, the time has come for regulators to engage with alternative control methods and include them in their suite of official measures.
机译:在新南威尔士州,自由漫游的猫被视为对生物多样性的最大威胁之一。然而,在某一阶段,它们被归类为“兔子的敌人”,并受到成千上万的保护和释放。本文的目的是研究澳大利亚猫咪的状况变化,证明根据特定时间点猫咪的有用性,监管经常取决于狭窄的价值观。到20世纪后期,自由漫游的猫的地位已经从兔子的敌人变成了对生物多样性的威胁,然后在二十一世纪变成了对生物安全的威胁。一旦猫的状况从兔子的敌人那里改变了,管理方法就会遵循历史驱动的途径,这些途径依靠致命的方法,这些方法不一定要优先考虑功效,动物福祉或改变的社区观念。这反映在当前的实践中,该实践很少考虑非致命过程,例如陷阱中性释放,并且在某些情况下使自由漫游猫的喂养和释放为非法。本文认为,如今在一个日益质疑这些措施的有效性以及对杀戮的迫切需求的社会中,出现了使用致命方法的法规偏好。尽管TNR不太可能为澳大利亚的自由漫游猫问题提供完整的解决方案,但鉴于TNR在社区群体中的成功以及社会观念的转变,现在是时候让监管机构采用替代控制方法并将其包括在内了在他们的官方措施中

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号