...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Evaluation of Animal-Based Indicators to Be Used in a Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sheep
【24h】

Evaluation of Animal-Based Indicators to Be Used in a Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sheep

机译:绵羊福利评估协议中基于动物的指标的评估

获取原文

摘要

Sheep are managed under a variety of different environments (continually outdoors, partially outdoors with seasonal or diurnal variation, continuously indoors) and for different purposes, which makes assessing welfare challenging. This diversity means that resource-based indicators are not particularly useful and thus a welfare assessment scheme for sheep, focusing on animal-based indicators, was developed. We focus specifically on ewes, as the most numerous group of sheep present on farm, although many of the indicators may also have relevance to adult male sheep. Using the Welfare Quality? framework of four Principles and 12 Criteria, we considered the validity, reliability and feasibility of 46 putative animal-based indicators for these criteria, derived from the literature. Where animal-based indicators were potentially unreliably or were not considered feasible, we also considered the resource-based indicators of access to water, stocking density and floor slipperiness. With the exception of the criteria ‘Absence of prolonged thirst’ we suggest at least one animal-based indicator for each welfare criterion. As a minimum, face validity was available for all indicators, however for many we found evidence of convergent validity, and discriminant validity (e.g. lameness as measured by gait score, body condition score). The reliability of most of the physical and health measures has been tested in the field and found to be appropriate for use in welfare assessment. However, for the majority of the proposed behavioural indicators (lying synchrony, social withdrawal, postures associated with pain, vocalisations, stereotypy, vigilance, response to surprise and human approach test) this still needs to be tested. In conclusion, the comprehensive assessment of sheep welfare through largely animal-based measures is supported by the literature through the use of indicators focusing on specific aspects of sheep biology. Further work is required for some indicators to ensure that measures are reliable when used in commercial settings.
机译:绵羊在各种不同的环境下(经常在户外,季节性或昼夜变化的部分户外,连续在室内)进行管理,并且出于不同的目的进行管理,这给评估福利带来了挑战。这种多样性意味着基于资源的指标并不是特别有用,因此制定了以动物指标为重点的绵羊福利评估计划。尽管许多指标也可能与成年雄性绵羊相关,但我们特别关注母羊,因为它是农场中数量最多的绵羊群体。使用福利质量?在4条原则和12条标准的框架内,我们考虑了从文献中得出的46条基于动物的指标的有效性,可靠性和可行性。在以动物为基础的指标可能不可靠或不可行的情况下,我们还考虑了以水为基础,获取水量,种群密度和地面滑爽度的资源指标。除了“没有长时间的口渴”标准外,我们建议为每个福利标准至少使用一种基于动物的指标。最低限度,所有指标都可以使用脸部有效性,但是对于许多指标,我们发现了收敛效度和区分效度的证据(例如,通过步态评分,身体状况评分衡量的la行)。大多数身体和健康措施的可靠性已在现场进行了测试,并被认为适合用于福利评估。但是,对于大多数提议的行为指标(躺下同步,社交退缩,与疼痛相关的姿势,发声,刻板印象,警惕,对惊奇的反应和人类进近测试),这仍然需要进行测试。总之,文献通过使用针对绵羊生物学特定方面的指标,对通过主要基于动物的措施对绵羊福利进行的综合评估提供了支持。一些指标需要做进一步的工作,以确保在商业环境中使用时这些措施是可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号