首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Oncology >Influencing Cancer Screening Participation Rates—Providing a Combined Cancer Screening Program (a ‘One Stop’ Shop) Could Be a Potential Answer
【24h】

Influencing Cancer Screening Participation Rates—Providing a Combined Cancer Screening Program (a ‘One Stop’ Shop) Could Be a Potential Answer

机译:影响癌症筛查的参与率—提供组合的癌症筛查计划(“一站式”商店)可能是一个潜在的答案

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Participation in established cancer screening programs remains variable. Therefore, a renewed focus on how to increase screening uptake, including addressing structural barriers such as time, travel, and cost is needed. One approach could be the provision of combined cancer screening, where multiple screening tests are provided at the same time and location (essentially a ‘One Stop’ screening shop). This cohort study explored both cancer screening behavior and the acceptability of a combined screening approach. Methods Participants of the North Western Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS), South Australia were invited to participate in a questionnaire about cancer screening behaviors and the acceptability of a proposed ‘One Stop’ cancer screening shop. Data were collected from 10th August 2015 to 18th January 2016, weighted for selection probability, age, and sex and analyzed using descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results 1,562 people, 52% female (mean age 54.1?years?±?15.2) participated. Reported screening participation was low, the highest being for Pap Smear (34.4%). Common reasons for screening participation were preventing sickness (56.1%, CI 53.2–59.0%), maintaining health (51%, CI 48–53.9%), and free program provision (30.9%, CI 28.2–33.6%). Females were less likely to state that screening is not beneficial [OR 0.37 (CI 0.21–0.66), p ?
机译:简介参与已建立的癌症筛查计划仍然存在差异。因此,需要重新关注如何增加筛查的吸收,包括解决诸如时间,旅行和成本等结构性障碍。一种方法可能是提供联合癌症筛查,即在同一时间和地点提供多个筛查测试(本质上是“一站式”筛查店)。这项队列研究探讨了癌症筛查行为和联合筛查方法的可接受性。方法南澳大利亚西北部阿德莱德健康研究(NWAHS)的参与者应邀参加了有关癌症筛查行为和拟议的“一站式”癌症筛查商店的可接受性的问卷调查。从2015年8月10日至2016年1月18日收集数据,对选择概率,年龄和性别进行加权,并使用描述性和多变量logistic回归分析进行分析。结果1,562人参加,其中女性占52%(平均年龄54.1岁)(±15.2)。报告的筛查参与率很低,最高的是子宫颈抹片检查(34.4%)。筛查参与的常见原因是预防疾病(56.1%,CI 53.2–59.0%),保持健康(51%,CI 48–53.9%)和免费计划提供(30.9%,CI 28.2–33.6%)。女性不太可能表示筛查无益[OR 0.37(CI 0.21-0.66),p 0.001),并引用疾病预防[OR 2.10(CI 1.46-3.00),p 0.001]和免费程序[OR 1.75(CI 1.22-2.51),p 0.003]作为筛查参与的原因。在那些不参加的人中,有34.6%(CI 30.3–39.1%)表示没有任何阻碍他们参加的人,年龄在55至64岁之间[OR 0.24(CI 0.07–0.74),p?<?0.04 ]不太可能引用此原因。 21%(CI 17.2–24.8%)认为他们不需要筛查,而一小部分表示没有时间(6.9%,CI 4.9–9.7%)和与筛查相关的费用(5.2%,CI 3.5–7.7%) 。大多数参与者(85.3%,CI 81.9-88.2%)支持在同一时间和地点进行多重筛查。结论本研究中确定的筛查行为与文献报道相似。对联合癌症筛查概念的高度支持表明,这种方法对于潜在的最终用户是可以接受的,因此有必要进行进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号