...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Cutaneous Mechanoreceptor Feedback from the Hand and Foot Can Modulate Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity
【24h】

Cutaneous Mechanoreceptor Feedback from the Hand and Foot Can Modulate Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity

机译:手脚的皮肤机械感受器反馈可以调节肌肉交感神经活动

获取原文
           

摘要

Stimulation of high threshold mechanical nociceptors on the skin can modulate efferent sympathetic outflow. Whether low threshold mechanoreceptors from glabrous skin are similarly capable of modulating autonomic outflow is unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of cutaneous afferent feedback from the hand palm and foot sole on efferent muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Fifteen healthy young participants (9 male; 25 ± 3 years [range: 22–29]) underwent microneurographic recording of multi-unit MSNA from the right fibular nerve during 2 min of baseline and 2 min of mechanical vibration (150 Hz, 220 μm peak-to-peak) applied to the left hand or foot. Each participant completed three trials of both hand and foot stimulation, each separated by 5 min. MSNA burst frequency decreased similarly during the 2 min of both hand (20.8 ± 8.9 vs. 19.3 ± 8.6 bursts/minute [Δ ?8%], p = 0.035) and foot (21.0 ± 8.3 vs. 19.5 ± 8.3 bursts/minute [Δ ?8%], p = 0.048) vibration but did not alter normalized mean burst amplitude or area (All p > 0.05). Larger reductions in burst frequency were observed during the first 10 s (onset) of both hand (20.8 ± 8.9 vs. 17.0 ± 10.4 [Δ ?25%], p < 0.001) and foot (21.0 ± 8.3 vs. 18.3 ± 9.4 [Δ ?16%], p = 0.035) vibration, in parallel with decreases in normalized mean burst amplitude (hand: 0.45 ± 0.06 vs. 0.36 ± 0.14% [Δ ?19%], p = 0.03; foot: 0.47 ± 0.07 vs. 0.34 ± 0.19% [Δ ?27%], p = 0.02) and normalized mean burst area (hand: 0.42 ± 0.05 vs. 0.32 ± 0.12% [Δ ?25%], p = 0.003; foot: 0.47 ± 0.05 vs. 0.34 ± 0.16% [Δ ?28%], p = 0.01). These results demonstrate that tactile feedback from the hands and feet can influence efferent sympathetic outflow to skeletal muscle.
机译:刺激皮肤上的高阈值机械伤害感受器可以调节传出的交感神经流出。来自无毛皮肤的低阈值机械感受器是否同样具有调节自主神经流出的能力尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是检查手掌和足底的皮肤传入反馈对传出肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)的影响。 15名健康的年轻参与者(9名男性; 25±3岁[范围:22–29])在基线2分钟和机械振动2分钟(150 Hz,220μm)中接受了来自右腓神经的多单位MSNA的微神经影像记录峰到峰)应用于左手或脚。每个参与者完成了手脚刺激的三个试验,每个试验间隔5分钟。两只手的2分钟(20.8±8.9对19.3±8.6猝发/分钟[Δ8%],p = 0.035)和足部(21.0±8.3对19.5±8.3猝发/分钟[21.0±8.3对。 Δ8%],p = 0.048)振动,但没有改变归一化平均猝发振幅或面积(所有p> 0.05)。在发病的前10 s内,手(20.8±8.9对17.0±10.4 [Δ25%],p <0.001)和脚(21.0±8.3对18.3±9.4 [21.0±8.3)对爆发频率的降低更大。 Δ?16%],p = 0.035)振动,同时归一化平均猝发幅度减小(手:0.45±0.06 vs. 0.36±0.14%[Δ?19%],p = 0.03;英尺:0.47±0.07 vs 0.34±0.19%[Δ27%],p = 0.02)和归一化平均猝发面积(手:0.42±0.05 vs. 0.32±0.12%[Δα25%],p = 0.003;脚:0.47±0.05 vs 0.34±0.16%[Δ?28%],p = 0.01)。这些结果表明,来自手和脚的触觉反馈可以影响到骨骼肌的传出交感神经流出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号