首页> 外文期刊>Maritime Studies >A tale of two communities: Using relational place-making to examine fisheries policy in the Pribilof Island communities of St. George and St. Paul, Alaska
【24h】

A tale of two communities: Using relational place-making to examine fisheries policy in the Pribilof Island communities of St. George and St. Paul, Alaska

机译:关于两个社区的故事:在阿拉斯加圣乔治和圣保罗的普里比洛夫岛社区中,利用关系场所营造方法研究渔业政策

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper describes how relational place-making, with its focus on power dynamics, networked politics, and non-market, locally-valued characteristics, provides a useful framework for managers to better design fishing community policies. Social data, while becoming more common in fisheries management analyses, are typically restricted to quantitative measures that often cannot adequately summarize dynamics within fishing communities. In contrast, detailed ethnographic research and the theoretical framework of relational place-making can provide a useful methodology through which to gather social data to understand resource-dependent communities and the effects of fisheries management policies in these places. Relational place-making describes the process through which physical spaces are transformed into socially meaningful places, and how these understandings are contested and negotiated among different groups of actors. These contested narratives of place, called place-frames, can interact with economic development efforts to help create (or fail to create) sustainable communities. To better understand the efficacy of a specific fisheries policy, the community development quota (CDQ) program, we conducted 6 months of ethnographic research in the rural, Native communities of St. George and St. Paul, Alaska. In both communities we found that local place-frames centered on local empowerment and control. In St. George, local place-frames conflicted with place-frames advanced by CDQ employees, and locals were unable to align place-making goals with local economic realities. In St. Paul, local residents and CDQ employees shared a place-frame, allowing them to accomplish numerous local development goals. However, differences in place-frames advanced by other political entities on the island often complicated development initiatives. This study supports previous research indicating that policies and development projects that increase local power and self-determination are most successful in furthering community sustainability and well-being. This study indicates that relational place-making can illuminate local goals and desires and is therefore of great utility to the fisheries management decision-making process.
机译:本文描述了关系场所营造如何以权力动态,网络政治以及非市场的,当地价值的特征为重点,如何为管理者更好地设计捕捞社区政策提供有用的框架。社会数据虽然在渔业管理分析中变得越来越普遍,但通常仅限于定量度量,而定量度量通常无法充分总结捕捞社区内部的动态。相反,详细的人种学研究和相关场所建立的理论框架可以提供一种有用的方法,通过该方法可以收集社会数据,以了解依赖资源的社区以及这些地区的渔业管理政策的影响。关系场所营造描述了将物理空间转变为对社会有意义的场所的过程,以及如何在不同的行为者群体之间争夺和协商这些理解。这些有争议的地方叙事,称为地方框架,可以与经济发展努力互动,以帮助建立(或未能建立)可持续社区。为了更好地了解特定渔业政策,社区发展配额(CDQ)计划的有效性,我们在阿拉斯加州圣乔治和圣保罗的农村社区进行了6个月的人种志研究。在这两个社区中,我们发现本地的地方框架集中于本地的赋权和控制。在圣乔治,当地的场所框架与CDQ员工提出的场所框架发生冲突,当地人无法使场所营造目标与当地的经济现实保持一致。在圣保罗,当地居民和CDQ员工共享一个场所框架,使他们能够实现众多本地发展目标。但是,岛上其他政治实体提出的地方框架差异常常使发展计划复杂化。这项研究支持以前的研究,这些研究表明,提高地方权力和自决权的政策和发展项目在促进社区可持续性和福祉方面最成功。这项研究表明,关系场所营造可以阐明当地的目标和愿望,因此对渔业管理决策过程具有很大的实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号