...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology >Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Electricity from Biogas Produced by Anaerobic Digestion
【24h】

Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Electricity from Biogas Produced by Anaerobic Digestion

机译:厌氧消化产生的沼气发电的生命周期环境影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate life cycle environmental impacts associated with the generation of electricity from biogas produced by the anaerobic digestion of agricultural products and waste. Five real plants in Italy were considered, using maize silage, slurry and tomato waste as feedstocks and co-generating electricity and heat; the latter is not utilized. The results suggest that maize silage and the operation of anaerobic digesters, including open storage of digestate, are the main contributors to the impacts of biogas electricity. The system which uses animal slurry is the best option, except for the marine and terrestrial eco-toxicity. The results also suggest that it is environmentally better to have smaller plants using slurry and waste rather than bigger installations which require maize silage to operate efficiently. Electricity from biogas is environmentally more sustainable than grid electricity for seven out of 11 impacts considered. However, in comparison with natural gas, biogas electricity is worse for seven out of 11 impacts. It also has mostly higher impacts than other renewables, with a few exceptions, notably solar photovoltaics. Thus, for the AD systems and mesophilic operating conditions considered in this study, biogas electricity can help reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions relative to a fossil-intensive electricity mix; however, some other impacts increase. If mitigation of climate change is the main aim, other renewables have a greater potential to reduce GHG emissions. If, in addition to this, other impacts are considered, then hydro, wind and geothermal power are better alternatives to biogas electricity. However, utilization of heat would improve significantly its environmental sustainability, particularly global warming potential, summer smog and the depletion of abiotic resources and the ozone layer. Further improvements can be achieved by banning open digestate storage to prevent methane emissions and regulating digestate spreading onto land to minimize emissions of ammonia and related environmental impacts.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估与厌氧消化农产品和废物产生的沼气发电有关的生命周期环境影响。考虑了意大利的五家真实工厂,它们使用玉米青贮饲料,矿浆和番茄废料为原料,并同时发电和供热;后者不被利用。结果表明,玉米青贮饲料和厌氧消化池的运行(包括消化液的露天储存)是影响沼气发电的主要因素。除海洋和陆地生态毒性外,使用动物粪便的系统是最佳选择。结果还表明,使用较小的工厂使用泥浆和废料比使用玉米青贮饲料才能有效运行的大型装置要有利于环境。在考虑的11种影响中,有7种来自沼气的电力在环境方面比电网电力更具可持续性。但是,与天然气相比,沼气发电在11种影响中有7种较差。与其他可再生能源相比,它产生的影响更大,只有少数例外,特别是太阳能光伏发电。因此,对于本研究中考虑的AD系统和中温操作条件,沼气发电可以帮助减少相对于化石燃料密集的电力混合物的温室气体(GHG)排放;但是,其他一些影响也会增加。如果以减轻气候变化为主要目标,则其他可再生能源在减少温室气体排放方面具有更大的潜力。如果除此以外还考虑其他影响,那么水力,风能和地热能是沼气发电的更好替代方案。但是,利用热量将大大改善其环境可持续性,尤其是全球变暖的潜力,夏季的烟雾以及非生物资源和臭氧层的消耗。禁止露天的消化液储存以防止甲烷排放,并限制消化液在土地上的扩散以最大程度地减少氨气的排放和相关的环境影响,可以实现进一步的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号