首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience >Comparing Plasticity of Response to Perceived Risk in the Textbook Example of Convergent Evolution of Desert Rodents and Their Predators; a Manipulative Study Employing the Landscape of Fear
【24h】

Comparing Plasticity of Response to Perceived Risk in the Textbook Example of Convergent Evolution of Desert Rodents and Their Predators; a Manipulative Study Employing the Landscape of Fear

机译:在沙漠鼠类及其掠食者趋同进化的教科书示例中比较对感知风险的可塑性;运用恐惧环境进行手控研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Foragers process information they gain from their surroundings to assess the risk from predators and balance it with the resources in their environment. Measuring these perceived risks from the perspective of the forager can produce a heatmap or their “fear” in the environments, a so-called “landscape of fear” (LOF). In an intercontinental comparison of rodents from the Mojave and Negev Deserts, we set to compare families that are used regularly as examples of convergent evolution, heteromyid and gerbilline respectively. Using a LOF spatial-analysis on data collected from common garden experiments in a semi-natural arena we asked: (1) do all four species understand the risk similarly in the exact same physical environment; (2) does relative relation between species affect the way species draw their LOFs, or does the evolutionary niche of a species have a greater impact on its LOF?; and (3) does predator facilitation between vipers and barn owls cause similar changes to the shape of the measured LOFs. For stronger comparative power we mapped the LOF of the rodents under two levels of risk: low risk (snakes only) and high risk (snakes and barn owls). We found concordance in the way all four species assessed risk in the arena. However, the patterns observed in the LOFs of each rodent family were different, and the way the topographic shape of the LOF changed when owls were introduced varied by species. Specifically, gerbils were more sensitive to owl-related risk than snakes and at the opposite correct for heteromyids. Our findings suggest that the community and environment in which a species evolved has a strong impact on the strategies said animals employ. We also conclude, that given the homogenous landscape we provide in our arena and the non- homogenous patterns of LOF maps, risk assessment can be independent of the physical conditions under which the animals find themselves.
机译:觅食者会处理从周围环境中获取的信息,以评估捕食者的风险并将其与环境中的资源平衡。从觅食者的角度衡量这些感知到的风险会在环境中产生热图或它们的“恐惧”,即所谓的“恐惧景观”(LOF)。在对莫哈韦沙漠和内盖夫沙漠的啮齿动物进行的洲际比较中,我们着手比较经常用作趋同进化,异种和沙土鼠尾的实例的科。通过对半自然环境中的普通花园实验收集的数据进行LOF空间分析,我们要求:(1)在完全相同的物理环境中,所有四个物种是否都相似地理解了风险; (2)物种之间的相对关系是否会影响物种获取其LOF的方式,还是物种的进化生态位对其LOF有更大的影响? (3)毒蛇和谷仓猫头鹰之间的捕食者便利化会导致被测LOF的形状发生类似变化。为了获得更高的比较力,我们将啮齿动物的LOF划分为两个风险级别:低风险(仅蛇)和高风险(蛇和谷仓猫头鹰)。我们发现所有四个物种在舞台上评估风险的方式都一致。然而,在每个啮齿动物科的LOF中观察到的模式是不同的,并且当引入猫头鹰时LOF的地形形状改变的方式因物种而异。特别是,沙鼠比猫头鹰更容易受到与猫头鹰有关的风险的影响,而异种动物的纠正则相反。我们的发现表明,物种进化所处的社区和环境对动物所采用的策略有很大影响。我们还得出结论,鉴于我们在赛场上提供的同质景观和LOF贴图的非同质模式,风险评估可以独立于动物所处的自然条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号