首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience >Lack of Associations between Female Hormone Levels and Visuospatial Working Memory, Divided Attention and Cognitive Bias across Two Consecutive Menstrual Cycles
【24h】

Lack of Associations between Female Hormone Levels and Visuospatial Working Memory, Divided Attention and Cognitive Bias across Two Consecutive Menstrual Cycles

机译:女性激素水平与视觉空间工作记忆,两个连续月经周期的注意力分散和认知偏差之间缺乏关联

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Interpretation of observational studies on associations between prefrontal cognitive functioning and hormone levels across the female menstrual cycle is complicated due to small sample sizes and poor replicability. Methods: This observational multisite study comprised data of n = 88 menstruating women from Hannover, Germany, and Zurich, Switzerland, assessed during a first cycle and n = 68 re-assessed during a second cycle to rule out practice effects and false-positive chance findings. We assessed visuospatial working memory, attention, cognitive bias and hormone levels at four consecutive time-points across both cycles. In addition to inter-individual differences we examined intra-individual change over time (i.e., within-subject effects). Results: Estrogen, progesterone and testosterone did not relate to inter-individual differences in cognitive functioning. There was a significant negative association between intra-individual change in progesterone and change in working memory from pre-ovulatory to mid-luteal phase during the first cycle, but that association did not replicate in the second cycle. Intra-individual change in testosterone related negatively to change in cognitive bias from menstrual to pre-ovulatory as well as from pre-ovulatory to mid-luteal phase in the first cycle, but these associations did not replicate in the second cycle. Conclusions: There is no consistent association between women's hormone levels, in particular estrogen and progesterone, and attention, working memory and cognitive bias. That is, anecdotal findings observed during the first cycle did not replicate in the second cycle, suggesting that these are false-positives attributable to random variation and systematic biases such as practice effects. Due to methodological limitations, positive findings in the published literature must be interpreted with reservation.
机译:背景:由于女性样本量小且可复制性差,有关女性额叶前额叶认知功能与激素水平之间关系的观察性研究的解释十分复杂。方法:这项观察性多站点研究包括来自德国汉诺威和瑞士苏黎世的n例88名经期女性的数据,该数据在第一周期中进行了评估,在第二周期中对n = 68的月经期妇女进行了重新评估,以排除实践影响和假阳性机会发现。我们评估了两个周期中四个连续时间点的视觉空间工作记忆,注意力,认知偏见和激素水平。除了个体间差异外,我们还研究了个体内部随时间的变化(即受试者内部效应)。结果:雌激素,孕激素和睾丸激素与个体间的认知功能差异无关。在第一个周期内,孕酮的个体内部变化与从排卵前到黄体中期的工作记忆变化之间存在显着的负相关,但这种关系在第二个周期中没有重复。在第一个周期中,睾丸激素的个体内变化与从月经到排卵前以及从排卵前到黄体中期的认知偏差变化呈负相关,但这些关联在第二个周期中没有重复。结论:妇女的激素水平,尤其是雌激素和孕激素,与注意力,工作记忆和认知偏差之间没有一致的关联。也就是说,在第一个周期中观察到的轶事发现在第二个周期中没有重复,这表明这些是假阳性,归因于随机变异和系统偏见,例如练习效果。由于方法的局限性,必须对公开发表的文献中的积极发现予以保留。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号