...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience >Measuring Attention in Rodents: Comparison of a Modified Signal Detection Task and the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task
【24h】

Measuring Attention in Rodents: Comparison of a Modified Signal Detection Task and the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task

机译:测量啮齿动物的注意力:修改后的信号检测任务与5选择序列反应时间任务的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Neuropsychiatric research has utilized cognitive testing in rodents to improve our understanding of cognitive deficits and for preclinical drug development. However, more sophisticated cognitive tasks have not been as widely exploited due to low throughput and the extensive training time required. We developed a modified signal detection task (SDT) based on the growing body of literature aimed at improving cognitive testing in rodents. This study directly compares performance on the modified SDT with a traditional test for measuring attention, the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT). Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained on either the 5CSRTT or the SDT. Briefly, the 5CSRTT required rodents to pay attention to a spatial array of five apertures and respond with a nose poke when an aperture was illuminated. The SDT required the rat to attend to a light panel and respond either left or right to indicate the presence of a signal. In addition, modifications were made to the reward delivery, timing, control of body positioning, and the self-initiation of trials. It was found that less training time was required for the SDT, with both sessions to criteria and daily session duration significantly reduced. Rats performed with a high level of accuracy (>87%) on both tasks, however omissions were far more frequent on the 5CSRTT. The signal duration was reduced on both tasks as a manipulation of task difficulty relevant to attention and a similar pattern of decreasing accuracy was observed on both tasks. These results demonstrate some of the advantages of the SDT over the traditional 5CSRTT as being higher throughput with reduced training time, fewer omission responses and their body position was controlled at stimulus onset. In addition, rats performing the SDT had comparable high levels of accuracy. These results highlight the differences and similarities between the 5CSRTT and a modified SDT as tools for assessing attention in preclinical animal models.
机译:神经精神病学研究已经在啮齿动物中利用认知测试来增进我们对认知缺陷和临床前药物开发的理解。然而,由于低通量和所需的大量训练时间,尚未更广泛地利用更复杂的认知任务。我们基于不断发展的文献开发了改进的信号检测任务(SDT),旨在改善啮齿动物的认知测试。这项研究直接将改进的SDT的性能与用于衡量注意力的传统测试(5选择串行反应时间任务(5CSRTT))进行比较。成年雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠接受5CSRTT或SDT训练。简而言之,5CSRTT要求啮齿动物注意五个孔的空间排列,并在照明一个孔时以鼻子戳的方式作出反应。 SDT要求大鼠照亮灯板,并向左或向右做出响应以指示信号的存在。此外,还对奖励的交付,时间安排,身体位置控制和试验的自我启动进行了修改。结果发现,SDT所需的培训时间更少,达到标准的疗程和每天的疗程都大大减少了。大鼠在两项任务上的准确性都很高(> 87%),但是在5CSRTT上遗漏的频率要高得多。通过操纵与注意力相关的任务难度,两个任务的信号持续时间都减少了,并且在两个任务上都观察到了相似的准确性下降模式。这些结果证明了SDT优于传统5CSRTT的一些优势,因为它具有更高的吞吐率,减少了训练时间,较少的遗漏反应,并且在刺激发作时控制了他们的身体位置。此外,进行SDT的大鼠具有相当高的准确性。这些结果突显了5CSRTT与改良的SDT作为评估临床前动物模型中注意力的工具之间的差异和相似性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号