首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience >Use of a Structured Mirrors Intervention Does Not Reduce Delirium Incidence But May Improve Factual Memory Encoding in Cardiac Surgical ICU Patients Aged Over 70 Years: A Pilot Time-Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Use of a Structured Mirrors Intervention Does Not Reduce Delirium Incidence But May Improve Factual Memory Encoding in Cardiac Surgical ICU Patients Aged Over 70 Years: A Pilot Time-Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:使用结构化镜面干预不会降低Deli妄发生率,但可能会改善70岁以上的心脏外科ICU患者的事实记忆编码:先行时间集群随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: Post-operative delirium remains a significant problem, particularly in the older surgical patient. Previous evidence suggests that the provision of supplementary visual feedback about ones environment via the use of a mirror may positively impact on mental status and attention (core delirium diagnostic domains). We aimed to explore whether use of an evidence-based mirrors intervention could be effective in reducing delirium and improving post-operative outcomes such as factual memory encoding of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) environment in older cardiac surgical patients. Methods: This was a pilot time-cluster randomized controlled trial at a 32-bed ICU, enrolling 223 patients aged 70 years and over, admitted to ICU after elective or urgent cardiac surgery from October 29, 2012 to June 23, 2013. The Mirrors Group received a structured mirrors intervention at set times (e.g., following change in mental status). The Usual Care Group received the standard care without mirrors. Primary outcome was ICU delirium incidence; secondary outcomes were ICU delirium days, ICU days with altered mental status or inattention, total length of ICU stay, physical mobilization (balance confidence) at ICU discharge, recall of factual and delusional ICU memories at 12 weeks, Health-Related Quality of Life at 12 weeks, and acceptability of the intervention. Results: The intervention was not associated with a significant reduction in ICU delirium incidence [Mirrors: 20/115 (17%); Usual Care: 17/108 (16%)] or duration [Mirrors: 1 (1–3); Usual Care: 2 (1–8)]. Use of the intervention on ICU was predictive of significantly higher recall of factual (but not delusional) items at 12 weeks after surgery ( p = 0.003) and acceptability was high, with clinicians using mirrors at 86% of all recorded hourly observations. The intervention did not significantly impact on other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Use of a structured mirrors intervention on the post-operative ICU does not reduce delirium, but may result in improved factual memory encoding in older cardiac surgical patients. This effect may occur via mechanisms unrelated to delirium, altered mental status, or inattention. The intervention may provide a new means of improving outcomes in patients at risk of post-ICU anxiety and/or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01599689.
机译:简介:术后ir妄仍然是一个严重的问题,尤其是在老年手术患者中。以前的证据表明,通过使用镜子提供有关某个环境的补充视觉反馈,可能会对精神状态和注意力产生积极影响(核心ir妄诊断范围)。我们旨在探讨使用基于证据的镜子干预措施是否可以有效减少reducing妄并改善术后结果,例如老年心脏外科手术患者重症监护病房(ICU)环境的事实记忆编码。方法:这是一项在32张病床的ICU上进行的时间集群随机对照试验,纳入223名70岁及以上的患者,于2012年10月29日至2013年6月23日接受择期或紧急心脏手术后入院。小组在设定的时间(例如,随着心理状态的改变)接受了有组织的镜像干预。通常护理小组获得了没有镜子的标准护理。主要结果是ICU del妄发生率。次要结局为ICU ir妄天数,ICU天数改变,精神状态或注意力不集中,ICU停留总时间,ICU出院时的身体动员(平衡置信度),12周时回忆和错觉的ICU记忆,健康相关生活质量12周,并接受干预。结果:干预与ICU del妄发生率的显着降低无关[镜像:20/115(17%);通常护理:17/108(16%)]或持续时间[镜子:1(1-3);通常护理:2(1–8)]。在ICU上使用干预措施可预测术后12周时对事实(而非妄想)物品的召回率将显着提高(p = 0.003),并且可接受性很高,临床医生在所有记录的每小时观察结果中使用镜子的比例为86%。干预对其他次要结局没有明显影响。结论:对术后ICU进行结构化镜面干预不会减少reduce妄,但可以改善老年心脏外科手术患者的事实记忆编码。这种影响可能是通过与ir妄,精神状态改变或注意力不集中无关的机制发生的。干预措施可能为改善患有ICU后焦虑症和/或创伤后应激障碍风险的患者的预后提供新的手段。试用注册:Clinicaltrials.gov标识符NCT01599689。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号