首页> 外文期刊>Majallah-i pizishki-i Urumiyah. >INVESTIGATING THE SHORT-TERM COMPLICATIONS OF DRAINAGE APPLIANCE, POST INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR OPERATION WITH LICHTENSTEIN METHOD IN THE PATIENTS ADMITTED TO THE SURGERY WARD OF IMAM KHOMEINI HOSPITAL
【24h】

INVESTIGATING THE SHORT-TERM COMPLICATIONS OF DRAINAGE APPLIANCE, POST INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR OPERATION WITH LICHTENSTEIN METHOD IN THE PATIENTS ADMITTED TO THE SURGERY WARD OF IMAM KHOMEINI HOSPITAL

机译:研究利马斯汀疗法对流产器具的短期并发症,利希滕斯坦方法进行的腹股沟后疝修补手术后接受IMAM KHOMEINI医院手术治疗的患者

获取原文
           

摘要

Background & Aims: Inguinal hernia is one of the most common causes of surgery in the world. With increasing of age hernia prevalence rate increases so that in age over 70 years its prevalence gets at 50 percent. Different methods are described in hernia repair and each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages. At present the method of choice for inguinal hernia repair is the tension free procedure which was first introduced by Lichtension. .This study investigates the short-term side effects of drainage applied in Lichtenstein method. Materials &Methods: This clinical trial study investigates 60 patients admitted to this center with the above mentioned diagnosis who have undergone hernia repair surgery. In 31 patients at the end of the operation close suction drain was applied versus 29 patients in whom no drain was used. Results: In the group of patients with drain the incidence of side effects was as follows: Hematoma 9.7%, seroma3.2%, urinary retention 0% versus the results in patient without drain: Hematoma3.4%, seroma0%, urinary retention 3.4% the mean time needed for the patients to return to their daily work in drain applied group was 17.48 days versus 18.30 days in patients with no drain application .Hence no significant statistical difference was observed in the two compared groups. A significant statistical difference was obvious when comparing two groups with post surgery hospitalizing period. This period in patients with drain was 2.9 days versus 1.48 days in patients without drain. Conclusion: Based on findings close suction drain not only decreases the incidence of complications such as hematoma, seroma and urinary retention but also increases the hospitalizing period, as well as producing overwhelming costs and depression of patients spirits, so that, it is suggested not to apply any drain at all.
机译:背景与目的:腹股沟疝是世界上最常见的手术原因之一。随着年龄的增长,疝的患病率增加,因此在70岁以上的年龄中,患病率达到50%。疝气修复中描述了不同的方法,每种方法都有其自身的优缺点。目前,腹股沟疝修补的首选方法是无张力手术,这是Lichtens首次提出的。这项研究调查了利希滕斯坦法应用排水的短期副作用。材料与方法:该临床试验研究调查了60名因上述诊断而入院接受疝修补手术的患者。手术结束时有31例患者采用了密闭引流,而没有使用引流的29例。结果:在有引流的患者中,副作用的发生率如下:血肿9.7%,血清瘤3.2%,尿retention留0%与无引流患者的结果:血肿3.4%,血清瘤0%,尿retention留3.4引流组患者恢复日常工作所需的平均时间百分比为17.48天,而无引流组患者为18.30天。因此,在两个比较组中未观察到统计学差异。将两组与术后住院时间进行比较,差异有统计学意义。引流患者的这一时期为2.9天,而无引流患者的这一时期为1.48天。结论:基于这些发现,紧密的引流不仅减少了血肿,血清肿和尿retention留等并发症的发生,而且增加了住院时间,并产生了压倒性的成本和患者精神沮丧,因此,建议不要完全涂抹排水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号