...
首页> 外文期刊>Malta Medical Journal >Spare the rod, spoil the child? A literaturereview of outcomes of physical punishment in relation to recent changes to Maltese Law
【24h】

Spare the rod, spoil the child? A literaturereview of outcomes of physical punishment in relation to recent changes to Maltese Law

机译:备用杆,宠坏孩子吗?关于马耳他法律最近变化的体罚结果的文献综述

获取原文
           

摘要

A literature review of outcomes of physical punishment in children confirms the polarised views resulting from various studies. This is mainly attributed to the limitations in the methodology and study designs used, confounding factors that were unaccounted for and the different ways in which physical punishment was defined by researchers. Researchers that provide evidence to discourage the use of physical punishment highlight the risk that this mode of discipline can easily cross over to physical abuse. This is challenged by other researchers who argue that alternative disciplinary techniques investigated with similar analyses to physical punishment have similar outcomes. Malta recently became one of the 39 countries worldwide that outlawed the use of physical punishment in children, in keeping with the United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child. The focus of legally banning the use of physical punishment is not to increase the number of parental prosecutions but to safeguard children and adopt a policy of zero tolerance towards any violence against them. Our role as health professionals should be in supporting and educating parents, including those from a different cultural background, in becoming authoritative parents that are able to discipline their children in an effective and nurturing manner, away from using any form of violence. Successful evidence based parental intervention programmes exist that may help provide these necessary skills. Health professionals should also adopt a child centred approach whereby the child?s views are considered and any allegation made taken seriously. Training in safeguarding children is recommended for all professionals who come into contact with children and families.
机译:有关儿童体罚结果的文献综述证实了各种研究得出的两极化观点。这主要归因于所使用的方法和研究设计的局限性,无法解释的混杂因素以及研究人员定义体罚的不同方式。提供证据劝阻不鼓励使用体罚的研究人员强调,这种纪律模式很容易越过身体虐待的风险。这受到其他研究人员的挑战,他们认为,采用与体罚相似的分析方法研究的其他学科方法具有相似的结果。根据《联合国儿童权利公约》,马耳他最近成为全球39个禁止对儿童使用体罚的国家之一。从法律上禁止使用体罚的重点不是增加父母起诉的数量,而是保护儿童并采取对任何暴力侵害儿童行为零容忍的政策。我们作为卫生专业人员的角色应该是在支持和教育父母(包括来自不同文化背景的父母)时,要成为能够以有效和养育方式对子女进行纪律的权威父母,而不要使用任何形式的暴力。存在成功的基于证据的父母干预计划,可以帮助提供这些必要的技能。卫生专业人员还应采取以儿童为中心的方法,考虑儿童的观点并认真对待任何指控。建议所有与儿童和家庭接触的专业人员进行有关保护儿童的培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号