首页> 外文期刊>Magnetic Resonance Insights >Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety of Gadoxetate Disodium vs Gadobenate Dimeglumine in Patients With Known or Suspected Focal Liver Lesions: Results of a Clinical Phase III Study
【24h】

Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety of Gadoxetate Disodium vs Gadobenate Dimeglumine in Patients With Known or Suspected Focal Liver Lesions: Results of a Clinical Phase III Study

机译:已知或怀疑局灶性肝病患者中加多西酯二钠vs加多巴胺双胍胺的诊断效力和安全性:一项临床III期研究的结果

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and safety of gadoxetate disodium vs gadobenate dimeglumine in patients with known or suspected focal liver lesions. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, inter-individual Phase III study. The primary target—technical efficacy—was already published. Here, secondary efficacy parameters—sensitivity and specificity—and safety in specific patient populations are presented. Patients with suspected or known focal liver lesions scheduled for contrast-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were recruited and categorized in 4 a priori specified subgroups: (1) all patients, (2) patients with liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]), (3) patients with cirrhosis, and (4) patients with HCC?+?cirrhosis. Dual multi-detector liver computed tomography (CT) served as standard of reference. Results: A total of 295 patients were included. While the overall increase in sensitivity across all 4 patient groups was comparable for gadoxetate disodium (increase from pre- to post-contrast ranging from 6.2% to 9.9%) and gadobenate dimeglumine (ranging from ?2.9% to 10.0%), significant differences were seen for some of the subgroups. There was a significantly higher increase in sensitivity for gadoxetate disodium in patients with HCC (7%) and HCC?+?cirrhosis (12.8%) in comparison with gadobenate dimeglumine. Specificity decreased for both agents: gadoxetate disodium by ?2.8% to ?6.3% and gadobenate dimeglumine by ?3.3% to ?8.7%. Gadoxetate showed a significantly lower loss of specificity in all subgroups. Safety was comparable in both groups. Conclusions: Gadoxetate disodium proved to be an effective liver-specific MRI contrast agent. Some distinct advantages over gadobenate dimeglumine were demonstrated in patients with HCC and patients with HCC?+?liver cirrhosis for sensitivity and specificity in liver lesion detection.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估在已知或怀疑局灶性肝损害的患者中,加多西酯二钠与加多贝酸二聚丁胺的诊断效力和安全性。方法:这是一项前瞻性,多中心,双盲,随机,个体间III期研究。主要目标-技术功效-已经发布。在此,介绍了特定患者人群的次级功效参数(敏感性和特异性)以及安全性。募集了计划进行对比增强肝磁共振成像(MRI)的可疑或已知局灶性肝病灶的患者,并将其分类为4个事先指定的亚组:(1)所有患者,(2)肝癌(肝细胞癌[HCC])患者),(3)肝硬化患者和(4)HCC ++肝硬化患者。双重多检测器肝脏计算机断层扫描(CT)作为参考标准。结果:共纳入295例患者。在所有4个患者组中,灵敏度的总体提高与gadoxetate二钠(对比前至对比后从6.2%增至9.9%)和gadobenate dimeglumine(从2.9%至10.0%不等)相当。在某些亚组中可见。与加多贝酸二聚丁二胺相比,HCC(7%)和HCC ++肝硬化(12.8%)患者对gadoxetate二钠的敏感性显着提高。两种药物的特异性都降低了:胍丁酯二钠降低约2.8%至6.3%,而胍丁二甲胺降低约3.3%至8.7%。加多西酯在所有亚组中均显示出明显较低的特异性丧失。两组的安全性相当。结论:加多西酯二钠被证明是一种有效的肝脏特异性MRI造影剂。在肝癌患者和肝癌HCC ++肝硬化患者中,在肝病变检测中的敏感性和特异性均显示出优于g酸钠二甲双胍的独特优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号