...
首页> 外文期刊>Future Science OA >Ultracentrifugation versus kit exosome isolation: nanoLC–MS and other tools reveal similar performance biomarkers, but also contaminations
【24h】

Ultracentrifugation versus kit exosome isolation: nanoLC–MS and other tools reveal similar performance biomarkers, but also contaminations

机译:超速离心与试剂盒外来体分离:nanoLC–MS和其他工具显示出相似的性能生物标志物,但也存在污染

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: For isolation of exosomes, differential ultracentrifugation and an isolation kit from a major vendor were compared. Materials & methods:?‘Case study’?exosomes isolated from patient-derived cells from glioblastoma multiforme and a breast cancer cell line were analyzed. Results:?Transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, western blotting, and so forth, revealed comparable performance. Potential protein biomarkers for both diseases were also identified in the isolates using nanoLC–MS. Western blotting and nanoLC–MS also revealed negative exosome markers regarding both isolation approaches. Conclusion: The two isolation methods had an overall similar performance, but we hesitate to use the term ‘exosome isolation’ as impurities may be present with both isolation methods. NanoLC–MS can detect disease biomarkers in exosomes and is useful for critical assessment of exosome enrichment procedures.
机译:目的:为了分离外泌体,比较了差异超速离心法和主要供应商的分离试剂盒。材料与方法:“案例研究”是从多形性胶质母细胞瘤和乳腺癌细胞系的患者来源细胞中分离出来的外泌体。结果:透射电子显微镜,动态光散射,蛋白质印迹等均显示出可比的性能。使用nanoLC-MS还可以在分离物中鉴定出两种疾病的潜在蛋白质生物标志物。 Western印迹和nanoLC-MS还揭示了两种分离方法的阴性外泌体标记。结论:这两种分离方法在总体上具有相似的性能,但是我们犹豫使用术语“外来体分离”,因为两种分离方法中都可能存在杂质。 NanoLC–MS可以检测外泌体中的疾病生物标志物,对于外泌体富集程序的严格评估很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号