首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology research and practice >Brand Name and Generic Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescriptions in the United States: Insights from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2006–2010)
【24h】

Brand Name and Generic Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescriptions in the United States: Insights from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2006–2010)

机译:美国的商标名称和质子泵抑制剂的通用处方:国家门诊医疗调查(2006-2010年)的见解

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are one of the most commonly prescribed medication classes with similar efficacy between brand name and generic PPI formulations.Aims. We determined demographic, clinical, and practice characteristics associated with brand name PPI prescriptions at ambulatory care visits in the United States.Methods. Observational cross sectional analysis using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) of all adult (≥18 yrs of age) ambulatory care visits from 2006 to 2010. PPI prescriptions were identified by using the drug entry code as brand name only or generic available formulations. Descriptive statistics were reported in terms of unweighted patient visits and proportions of encounters with brand name PPI prescriptions. Global chi-square tests were used to compare visits with brand name PPI prescriptions versus generic PPI prescriptions for each measure. Poisson regression was used to determine the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for generic versus brand PPI prescribing.Results. A PPI was prescribed at 269.7 million adult ambulatory visits, based on 9,677 unweighted visits, of which 53% were brand name only prescriptions. In 2006, 76.0% of all PPI prescriptions had a brand name only formulation compared to 31.6% of PPI prescriptions in 2010. Visits by patients aged 25–44 years had the greatest proportion of brand name PPI formulations (57.9%). Academic medical centers and physician-owned practices had the greatest proportion of visits with brand name PPI prescriptions (58.9% and 55.6% of visits with a PPI prescription, resp.). There were no significant differences in terms of median income, patient insurance type, or metropolitan status when comparing the proportion of visits with brand name versus generic PPI prescriptions. Poisson regression results showed that practice ownership type was most strongly associated with the likelihood of receiving a brand name PPI over the entire study period. Compared to HMO visits, patient visits at academic medical centers (IRR 4.2, 95% CI 2.2–8.0), physician-owned practices (IRR 3.9, 95% CI 2.1–7.1), and community health centers (IRR 3.6, 95% CI 1.9–6.6) were all more likely to have brand name PPIs.Conclusion. PPI prescriptions with brand name only formulations are most strongly associated with physician practice type.
机译:介绍。质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是最常用的处方药之一,在品牌名称和通用PPI制剂之间具有相似的功效。我们在美国的门诊就诊中确定了与品牌PPI处方相关的人口统计学,临床和实践特征。使用国家门诊医疗保健调查(NAMCS)对2006年至2010年所有成人(≥18岁)门诊就诊进行的观察性横断面分析。通过使用仅作为商标名称或通用可用制剂的药物输入代码来识别PPI处方。报告的统计数据是根据未加权的患者就诊次数和与品牌PPI处方的相识比例得出的。全球卡方检验用于比较每次测量中使用品牌PPI处方和通用PPI处方的访问。使用Poisson回归确定仿制药与品牌PPI处方的发生率比(IRR)。根据9,677次非加权访问,对2.697亿成人门诊进行了PPI处方,其中53%是仅基于品牌的处方。 2006年,所有PPI处方中有76.0%的处方是纯品牌处方,而2010年为PPI处方的31.6%。25-44岁患者就诊时,使用PPI处方的比例最大(57.9%)。学术医疗中心和医师拥有的执业医师使用品牌PPI处方进行访问的比例最高(分别为58.9%和55.6%)。在比较以品牌名称和普通PPI处方就诊的比例时,在中位数收入,患者保险类型或大都市状况方面没有显着差异。 Poisson回归结果表明,在整个研究期间,实践所有权类型与获得品牌名称PPI的可能性密切相关。与HMO访问相比,在学术医疗中心进行患者访问(IRR 4.2,95%CI 2.2-8.0),医生拥有的做法(IRR 3.9,95%CI 2.1-7.1)和社区卫生中心(IRR 3.6,95%CI 1.9–6.6)更有可能拥有品牌PPI。结论。仅具有品牌名称的配方的PPI处方与医师执业类型密切相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号