首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Marine Science >Ocean Futures Under Ocean Acidification, Marine Protection, and Changing Fishing Pressures Explored Using a Worldwide Suite of Ecosystem Models
【24h】

Ocean Futures Under Ocean Acidification, Marine Protection, and Changing Fishing Pressures Explored Using a Worldwide Suite of Ecosystem Models

机译:使用全球生态系统模型探索海洋酸化,海洋保护和不断变化的捕捞压力下的海洋期货

获取原文
       

摘要

Ecosystem-based management (EBM) of the ocean considers all impacts on and uses of marine and coastal systems. In recent years, there has been a heightened interest in EBM tools that allow testing of alternative management options and help identify tradeoffs among human uses. End-to-end ecosystem modelling frameworks that consider a wide range of management options are a means to provide integrated solutions to the complex ocean management problems encountered in EBM. Here, we leverage the global advances in ecosystem modelling to explore common opportunities and challenges for ecosystem-based management, including changes in ocean acidification, spatial management, and fishing pressure across eight Atlantis (atlantis.cmar.csiro.au) end-to-end ecosystem models. These models represent marine ecosystems from the tropics to the arctic, varying in size, ecology, and management regimes, using a three-dimensional, spatially-explicit structure parametrized for each system. Results suggest stronger impacts from ocean acidification and marine protected areas than from altering fishing pressure, both in terms of guild-level (i.e., aggregations of similar species or groups) biomass and in terms of indicators of ecological and fishery structure. Effects of ocean acidification were typically negative (reducing biomass), while MPAs led to both 'winners' and 'losers' at the level of particular species (or functional groups). Changing fishing pressure (doubling or halving) had smaller effects on the species guilds or ecosystem indicators than either OA or MPAs. Compensatory effects within guilds led to weaker average effects at the guild level than the species or group level. The impacts and tradeoffs implied by these future scenarios are highly relevant as ocean governance shifts focus from single-sector objectives (e.g., sustainable levels of individual fished stocks) to taking into account competing industrial sectors' objectives (e.g., simultaneous spatial management of energy, shipping, and fishing) while at the same time grappling with compounded impacts of global climate change (e.g., ocean acidification and warming).
机译:海洋的基于生态系统的管理(EBM)考虑了对海洋和沿海系统的所有影响和使用。近年来,人们对EBM工具的兴趣日益浓厚,这些工具可以测试替代管理选项并帮助确定人类使用之间的权衡。考虑广泛管理选项的端到端生态系统建模框架是为EBM中遇到的复杂海洋管理问题提供集成解决方案的一种方式。在这里,我们利用生态系统建模的全球进步来探索基于生态系统的管理的共同机遇和挑战,包括海洋酸化,空间管理的变化以及端到端八个亚特兰蒂斯(atlantis.cmar.csiro.au)的捕捞压力。最终生态系统模型。这些模型使用为每个系统参数化的三维空间显性结构,代表了从热带到北极的海洋生态系统,其规模,生态和管理体制各不相同。结果表明,无论是在行会层面(即类似物种或群体的聚集)生物量方面还是在生态和渔业结构指标方面,海洋酸化和海洋保护区带来的影响都比改变捕捞压力带来的影响更大。海洋酸化的影响通常是负面的(减少生物量),而海洋保护区在特定物种(或官能团)的水平上既导致“赢家”也导致“失败者”。改变捕捞压力(加倍或减半)对物种行会或生态系统指标的影响要小于OA或MPA。行会内部的补偿效应导致行会一级的平均效应比物种或群体一级的弱。随着海洋治理的重点从单一部门目标(例如,单个鱼类种群的可持续水平)转向考虑竞争性工业部门的目标(例如,能源的同时空间管理,运输和捕鱼),同时又要应对全球气候变化的综合影响(例如,海洋酸化和变暖)。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号