首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology Report >A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson’s score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 revised Atlanta Classification
【24h】

A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson’s score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 revised Atlanta Classification

机译:根据2012年修订的亚特兰大分类标准,比较APACHE II,BISAP,Ranson评分和改良的CTSI在预测急性胰腺炎的严重程度方面的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

ObjectiveOur aim was to prospectively compare the Accuracy of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP), Ranson’s score and modified Computed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI) in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on Atlanta 2012 definitions in a tertiary care hospital in northern India.MethodsFifty patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to our hospital during the period of March 2015 to September 2016 were included in the study. APACHE II, BISAP and Ranson’s score were calculated for all the cases. Modified CTSI was also determined based on a pancreatic protocol contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CT). Optimal cut-offs for these scoring systems and the area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated based on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and these scoring systems were compared prospectively.ResultsOf the 50 cases, 14 were graded as severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatic necrosis was present in 15 patients, while 14 developed persistent organ failure and 14 needed intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The AUC for modified CTSI was consistently the highest for predicting severe acute pancreatitis (0.919), pancreatic necrosis (0.993), organ failure (0.893) and ICU admission (0.993). APACHE II was the second most accurate in predicting severe acute pancreatitis (AUC 0.834) and organ failure (0.831). APACHE II had a high sensitivity for predicting pancreatic necrosis (93.33%), organ failure (92.86%) and ICU admission (92.31%), and also had a high negative predictive value for predicting pancreatic necrosis (96.15%), organ failure (96.15%) and ICU admission (95.83%).ConclusionAPACHE II is a useful prognostic scoring system for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis and can be a crucial aid in determining the group of patients that have a high chance of need for tertiary care during the course of their illness and therefore need early resuscitation and prompt referral, especially in resource-limited developing countries.
机译:目的我们的目的是前瞻性比较急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II,急性胰腺炎严重程度的床旁指数(BISAP),Ranson评分和改良的计算机体层摄影严重度指数(CTSI)在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度方面的准确性该方法纳入了印度北部一家三级医院的亚特兰大2012年定义。方法本研究纳入了2015年3月至2016年9月期间入院的50例急性胰腺炎患者。计算所有案例的APACHE II,BISAP和Ranson得分。还基于胰腺协议对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)确定了改良的CTSI。根据受试者的工作特征(ROC)曲线评估这些评分系统的最佳临界值和曲线下面积(AUC),并对这些评分系统进行前瞻性比较。结果50例患者中,有14例被归为严重急性胰腺炎。 15例患者出现胰腺坏死,而14例发展为持续性器官衰竭,其中14例需要重症监护病房(ICU)入院。修改后的CTSI的AUC始终是预测严重急性胰腺炎(0.919),胰腺坏死(0.993),器官衰竭(0.893)和ICU入院(0.993)的最高值。 APACHE II在预测严重急性胰腺炎(AUC 0.834)和器官衰竭(0.831)方面排名第二。 APACHE II对预测胰腺坏死(93.33%),器官衰竭(92.86%)和ICU入院(92.31%)具有很高的敏感性,并且对预测胰腺坏死(96.15%)和器官衰竭(96.15)具有较高的阴性预测价值%)和ICU入院率(95.83%)。结论APACHE II是一种有用的预后评分系统,可预测急性胰腺炎的严重程度,并且对于确定在此过程中极有必要进行三级护理的患者群体可能是至关重要的帮助病,因此需要及早复苏并及时转诊,特别是在资源有限的发展中国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号