...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Physiology >A Monetary Reward Alters Pacing but Not Performance in Competitive Cyclists
【24h】

A Monetary Reward Alters Pacing but Not Performance in Competitive Cyclists

机译:金钱奖励可以改变自行车骑手的步伐,但不会改变他们的表现

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Money has frequently been used as an extrinsic motivator since it is assumed that humans are willing to invest more effort for financial reward. However, the influence of a monetary reward on pacing and performance in trained athletes is not well-understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the influence of a monetary reward in well-trained cyclists on their pacing and performance during short and long cycling time trials (TT). Twentythree cyclists (6 ♀, 17 ♂) completed 4 self-paced time trials (TTs, 2 short: 4 km and 6 min; 2 long: 20 km and 30 min); in a randomized order. Participants were separated into parallel, non-randomized “rewarded” and “non-rewarded” groups. Cyclists in the rewarded group received a monetary reward based on highest mean power output across all TTs. Cyclists in the non-rewarded group did not receive a monetary reward. Overall performance was not significantly different between groups in short or long TTs (p > 0.48). Power output showed moderatly lower effect sizes at comencement of the short TTs (Pmeandiff = 36.6 W; d > 0.44) and the 20 km TT (Pmeandiff = 22.6 W; d = 0.44) in the rewarded group. No difference was observed in pacing during the 30 min TT (p = 0.95). An external reward seems to have influenced pacing at the commencement of time trials. Participants in the non-rewarded group adopted a typical parabolic shaped pattern, whereas participants in the rewarded group started trials more conservatively. Results raise the possibility that using money as an extrinsic reward may interfere with regulatory processes required for effective pacing.
机译:金钱经常被用作外部动机,因为人们认为人们愿意为付出金钱付出更多的努力。但是,金钱奖励对训练有素的运动员的步调和表现的影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是分析在短期和长期骑行时间试验(TT)中,训练有素的自行车手的金钱奖励对其步伐和表现的影响。 23个骑自行车的人(6岁,17岁)完成了4次自定时间的计时赛(TT,2个短距离:4公里和6分钟; 2个长距离:20公里和30分钟);以随机的顺序。参与者分为平行的,非随机的“奖励”和“非奖励”组。奖励组中的骑自行车者根据所有TT的最高平均功率输出获得金钱奖励。未奖励组中的骑自行车者没有获得金钱奖励。短期或长期TT组之间的总体表现没有显着差异(p> 0.48)。在奖励组中,在短时间TT(Pmeandiff = 36.6 W; d> 0.44)和20 km TT(Pmeandiff = 22.6 W; d = 0.44)开始时,功率输出显示适度较低的效应大小。在30分钟的TT期间,起搏未见差异(p = 0.95)。在计时赛开始时,外部奖励似乎已经影响了节奏。非奖励组的参与者采用典型的抛物线形模式,而奖励组的参与者则更为保守地开始试验。结果增加了将金钱用作外部奖励可能干扰有效起搏所需的监管过程的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号