...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Physiology >A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery
【24h】

A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery

机译:泡沫轧制对性能和回收率影响的Meta分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Foam rolling is thought to improve muscular performance and flexibility as well as to alleviate muscle fatigue and soreness. For this reason, foam rolling has become a popular intervention in all kinds of sport settings used to increase the efficiency of training or competition preparation as well as to speed post-exercise recovery. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of foam rolling applied before (pre-rolling as a warm-up activity) and after (post-rolling as a recovery strategy) exercise on sprint, jump, and strength performance as well as on flexibility and muscle pain outcomes and to identify whether self-massage with a foam roller or a roller massager is more effective. A comprehensive and structured literature search was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, PEDro, and Cochrane Library search engines. Twenty-one studies were located that met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen studies used pre-rolling, while seven studies used post-rolling. Pre-rolling resulted in a small improvement in sprint performance (+0.7%, g = 0.28) and flexibility (+4.0%, g = 0.34), whereas the effect on jump (?1.9%, g = 0.09) and strength performance (+1.8%, g = 0.12) was negligible. Post-rolling slightly attenuated exercise-induced decreases in sprint (+3.1%, g = 0.34) and strength performance (+3.9 %, g = 0.21). It also reduced muscle pain perception (+6.0%, g = 0.47), whereas its effect on jump performance (?0.2%, g = 0.06) was trivial. Of the twenty-one studies, fourteen used foam rollers, while the other seven used roller massage bars/sticks. A tendency was found for foam rollers to offer larger effects on the recovery of strength performance (+5.6%, g = 0.27 vs. ?0.1%, g = ?0.01) than roller massagers. The differences in the effects between foam rolling devices in terms of pre-rolling did not seem to be of practical relevance (overall performance: +2.7 %, g = 0.11 vs. +0.4%, g = 0.21; flexibility: +5.0%, g = 0.32 vs. +1.6%, g = 0.39). Overall, it was determined that the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery are rather minor and partly negligible, but can be relevant in some cases (e.g., to increase sprint performance and flexibility or to reduce muscle pain sensation). Evidence seems to justify the widespread use of foam rolling as a warm-up activity rather than a recovery tool.
机译:泡沫滚动被认为可改善肌肉性能和柔韧性以及减轻肌肉疲劳和酸痛。因此,泡沫滚动已成为各种运动环境中的一种流行干预手段,可用于提高训练或比赛准备的效率以及加快运动后恢复的速度。这项荟萃分析的目的是比较泡沫轧制之前(轧制前作为热身活动)和锻炼后(轧制后作为恢复策略)对冲刺,跳跃和力量表现的影响。例如弹性和肌肉疼痛的结果,并确定用泡沫滚筒或滚筒按摩器进行自我按摩是否更有效。使用PubMed,Google Scholar,PEDro和Cochrane Library搜索引擎进行了全面而结构化的文献搜索。找到21个符合纳入标准的研究。十四项研究使用前滚动,而七项研究使用后滚动。预滚动导致短跑性能(+ 0.7%,g = 0.28)和柔韧性(+ 4.0%,g = 0.34)略有改善,而对跳跃的影响(?1.9%,g = 0.09)和力量表现( + 1.8%,g = 0.12)可以忽略不计。滚动后运动引起的短跑(+ 3.1%,g = 0.34)和力量表现(+ 3.9%,g = 0.21)的轻微减弱。它也减少了肌肉疼痛感(+ 6.0%,g = 0.47),而其对跳跃表现的影响(?0.2%,g = 0.06)微不足道。在二十一项研究中,有十四项使用泡沫滚筒,而其他七项使用滚筒按摩棒。发现泡沫滚筒与滚筒按摩器相比,对强度性能的恢复具有更大的影响(+ 5.6%,g = 0.27对?0.1%,g = 0.01)。泡沫轧制设备在预轧方面的效果差异似乎没有实际意义(总体性能:+2.7%,g = 0.11与+ 0.4%,g = 0.21;柔韧性:+ 5.0%, g = 0.32对+ 1.6%,g = 0.39)。总体而言,已确定泡沫滚动对性能和恢复的影响相当小,并且可以忽略不计,但是在某些情况下可能是相关的(例如,提高冲刺性能和柔韧性或减轻肌肉疼痛感)。证据似乎证明泡沫轧制广泛用作热身活动而不是恢复工具是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号