首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Physiology >Landing-Takeoff Asymmetries Applied to Running Mechanics: A New Perspective for Performance
【24h】

Landing-Takeoff Asymmetries Applied to Running Mechanics: A New Perspective for Performance

机译:着陆起飞不对称技术在运行力学中的应用:性能的新视角

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Elastic bouncing is a physio-mechanical model that can elucidate running behavior in different situations, including landing and takeoff patterns and the characteristics of the muscle-tendon units during stretch and recoil in running. An increase in running speed improves the body’s elastic mechanisms. Although some measures of elastic bouncing are usually carried out, a general description of the elastic mechanism has not been explored in running performance. This study aimed to compare elastic bouncing parameters between the higher- and lower-performing athletes in a 3000 m test. Methods: Thirty-eight endurance runners (men) were divided into two groups based on 3000 m performance: the high-performance group (P _(high); n = 19; age: 29 ± 5 years; mass: 72.9 ± 10 kg; stature: 177 ± 8 cm; 3000 _(time): 656 ± 32 s) and the low-performance group (P _(low); n = 19; age: 32 ± 6 years; mass: 73.9 ± 7 kg; stature: 175 ± 5 cm; 3000 _(time): 751 ± 29 s). They performed three tests on different days: (i) 3000 m on a track; (ii) incremental running test; and (iii) a running biomechanical test on a treadmill at 13 different speeds from 8 to 20 km h ~(?1). Performance was evaluated using the race time of the 3000 m test. The biomechanics variables included effective contact time ( t _(ce)), aerial time ( t _(ae)), positive work time ( t _(push)), negative work time ( t _(break)), step frequency ( f _(step)), and elastic system frequency ( f _(sist)), vertical displacement ( S _(v)) in t _(ce) and t _(ae) ( S _(ce) and S _(ae)), vertical force, and vertical stiffness were evaluated in a biomechanical submaximal test on treadmill. Results: The t _(ae), f _(sist), vertical force and stiffness were higher ( p & 0.05) and t _(ce) and f _(step) were lower ( p & 0.05) in P _(high), with no differences between groups in t _(push) and t _(break). Conclusion: The elastic bouncing was optimized in runners of the best performance level, demonstrating a better use of elastic components.
机译:背景:弹性弹跳是一种物理力学模型,可以阐明在不同情况下的跑步行为,包括着陆和起飞模式以及跑步中伸展和后坐时肌肉肌腱单位的特征。跑步速度的提高改善了人体的弹性机制。尽管通常会采取一些弹性弹跳的措施,但在跑步性能方面并未探索弹性机构的一般描述。这项研究旨在比较在3000 m测试中表现较高和较低的运动员之间的弹性弹跳参数。方法:38名耐力跑者(男子)根据3000 m的表现分为两组:高性能组(P _(high); n = 19;年龄:29±5岁;质量:72.9±10 kg ;身材:177±8 cm; 3000 _(时间):656±32 s)和低能组(P _(低); n = 19;年龄:32±6岁;体重:73.9±7 kg;身高:175±5厘米; 3000 _(时间):751±29 s)。他们在不同的日期进行了三项测试:(i)在轨道上3000 m; (ii)增量运行测试; (iii)在跑步机上以13种不同的速度从8至20 km h〜(?1)进行生物力学测试。使用3000 m测试的比赛时间评估性能。生物力学变量包括有效接触时间(t_(ce)),空中时间(t_(ae)),正工作时间(t_(推)),负工作时间(t_(break)),步频( f _(step)),弹性系统频率(f _(sist)),t _(ce)和t _(ae)的垂直位移(S _(v))(S _(ce)和S _( ae)),垂直力和垂直刚度在跑步机上的生物力学次最大测试中进行了评估。结果:在P _中,t _(ae),f _(sist),垂直力和刚度较高(p <0.05),t _(ce)和f _(step)较低(p <0.05)。 (高),t _(推)和t _(break)的组之间没有差异。结论:在性能最佳的跑步者中对弹性弹跳进行了优化,这表明可以更好地使用弹性组件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号