...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Immunology >Editorial: History of Chemoattractant Research
【24h】

Editorial: History of Chemoattractant Research

机译:社论:趋化研究的历史

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This Research Topic entitled “History of Chemoattractant Research” collects a series of personal stories by numerous experts in the field of chemoattractant research. The individual contributions portray some key discoveries that helped to transform cell migration research into a global playing field within immunology (and beyond). Early progress had a profound effect on both academia and industry. Today, numerous academic laboratories are fully engaged in compiling a detailed road map describing the highly complex network of immune and tissue cells that respond to chemoattractants. Industrial research, on the other hand, centers on drugs that interfere with immune cell traffic in inflammatory diseases and cancer.By definition, chemoattractants include early (“classical”) chemoattractants of variable chemical composition and the large family of chemokines (chemotactic cytokines) that greatly outnumber the former compounds. As inferred from their name, all chemoattractants share the ability to induce cell migration (chemotaxis) via binding to a single class of G-protein-coupled receptors on target cells. Chemoattractant research was originally viewed as a specialty subject within cell biology. However, due to the increasing number of chemoattractants being discovered and their effect on every type of immune cells distributed throughout our body, it became quickly clear that chemoattractants constitute essential regulators of all aspects in immunity. Defects in the chemoattractant system are frequently associated with immunodeficiencies or autoimmunity/chronic diseases. We now know that the complexity of the chemokine and classical chemoattractant system perfectly mirrors the multitude of immune cells distinguished by lineage relationship, function, and tissue location. In fact, chemokine receptor profiling turned out to be highly useful for defining immune cell subsets as exemplified by the numerous T-helper subsets that we know today. Indeed, such work has led to a fundamental paradigm linking the functional specialization of distinct immune cells with their migratory behavior. No doubt, the principal and unifying function of chemoattractants is their ability to induce directional cell migration, involving processes as complex as immune cell transendothelial migration as well as chemokine gradient-controlled immune cell migration within tissues. In addition, some chemokines are able to costimulate T-cell differentiation, promote immune cell survival, or act as antimicrobial peptides in peripheral epithelial tissues. A few constitutive chemokines are essential for organ development during embryogenesis and some of these even control tumor cell relocation to secondary sites. Their importance is further emphasized by the realization that viruses have hijacked host genes encoding chemokines and their receptors in order to interfere with antiviral immunity or have evolved to use certain chemokine receptors as entry coreceptors.The following series of “short stories” provide personal accounts on key discoveries. The individual molecular discoveries enabled numerous research laboratories worldwide to unravel their significance in steady-state or pathological immune processes. Although groundbreaking in their own right, it is worth emphasizing that rapid progress in chemoattractant research was only made possible by many other laboratories whose work attached “meaning” to these early findings. The authors of this miniseries are discussing their findings in the context of time, place, and subsequent progress enabled by their discoveries. It is hoped that a wide readership will find these accounts entertaining as well as educational although those who wish to gain a more detailed knowledge are referred to the many outstanding reviews on chemokines and other chemoattractants.The field of chemokines really started in 1987 with the cloning of the human gene encoding CXCL8, which occurred in parallel in the laboratories of five independent international groups. Two stories, one by Marco Baggiolini ( 1 ) and the other by Teizo Yoshimura ( 2 ), summarize this groundbreaking discovery and give a vivid account about the friendly race that ensued from the realization that activated monocytes secreted neutrophil-specific chemoattractant activity to the molecular discovery of CXCL8. Unfortunately, and probably due to the enthusiasm shared by the research community at that time, it was decided to call CXCL8 an interleukin (IL-8), which turned out to be a misleading denomination. The three-dimensional structure of CXCL8 is a hallmark of all members of the chemokine superfamily and indicated that, in fact, chemokine-like proteins have been identified several years before CXCL8. These include IP10 (CXCL10) ( 3 ), LD78 (CCL3) ( 4 ), and TCA3 ( 5 ), the mouse ortholog of human I-309 (CCL1) ( 6 ). However, their chemoattractant activity remained obscure until well after the discovery of CXCL8. Also, platelet factor 4 (CXCL4) ( 7 – 9
机译:本研究主题为“化学引诱剂研究的历史”,收集了化学引诱剂研究领域的众多专家的一系列个人故事。个人贡献描绘了一些关键发现,这些发现有助于将细胞迁移研究转变为免疫学领域(以及以后)的全球竞争领域。早期的进步对学术界和工业界都产生了深远的影响。如今,许多学术实验室都在忙于编写详细的路线图,以描述对趋化因子有反应的高度复杂的免疫细胞和组织细胞网络。另一方面,工业研究的重点是在炎性疾病和癌症中干扰免疫细胞运输的药物。根据定义,趋化剂包括化学成分可变的早期(“经典”)趋化剂和大量的趋化因子(趋化细胞因子)家族。大大超过了以前的化合物。从它们的名字推断,所有趋化因子通过结合靶细胞上的一类G蛋白偶联受体而具有诱导细胞迁移(趋化性)的能力。化学引诱剂研究最初被视为细胞生物学中的专业。但是,由于发现的化学吸引剂数量越来越多,并且它们对分布在我们体内的每种类型的免疫细胞的影响越来越明显,化学吸引剂构成了免疫各个方面的重要调节剂。趋化系统的缺陷通常与免疫缺陷或自身免疫/慢性疾病有关。现在我们知道,趋化因子和经典趋化因子系统的复杂性完美地反映了由谱系关系,功能和组织位置区别开来的众多免疫细胞。实际上,事实证明趋化因子受体图谱对于定义免疫细胞亚群非常有用,正如我们今天所知道的众多T辅助细胞亚群所例证的那样。确实,这种工作导致了将不同免疫细胞的功能专一性与其迁徙行为联系起来的基本范式。毫无疑问,化学引诱剂的主要和统一功能是它们诱导定向细胞迁移的能力,涉及复杂的过程,如免疫细胞跨内皮迁移以及组织内趋化因子梯度控制的免疫细胞迁移。此外,某些趋化因子能够共同刺激T细胞分化,促进免疫细胞存活或充当外周上皮组织中的抗菌肽。一些组成型趋化因子对于胚胎发生过程中的器官发育至关重要,其中一些甚至控制肿瘤细胞向次级部位的迁移。认识到病毒已经劫持了编码趋化因子及其受体的宿主基因以干扰抗病毒免疫,或者已经进化为使用某些趋化因子受体作为进入共受体,进一步强调了它们的重要性。关键发现。单个分子的发现使全球众多研究实验室得以阐明其在稳态或病理性免疫过程中的重要性。尽管其本身具有开创性的意义,但值得强调的是,化学引诱剂研究的快速进展只有其他许多实验室才能实现,这些实验室的工作对这些早期发现赋予了“意义”。这个小型系列的作者正在时间,地点以及他们的发现所带来的后续进展的背景下讨论他们的发现。希望广大读者能从中找到寓教于乐的知识,尽管希望获得更详细知识的人可以参考许多关于趋化因子和其他化学引诱剂的杰出评论。趋化因子领域的真正始于1987年,编码CXCL8的人类基因中的一部分,在五个独立的国际组织的实验室中并行发生。两个故事,一个由Marco Baggiolini(1)撰写,另一个由Teizo Yoshimura(2)撰写,总结了这一开创性发现,并生动地描述了友好的种族,因为认识到激活的单核细胞向分子分泌了中性白细胞特异性趋化活性。发现CXCL8。不幸的是,并且可能由于当时研究界的热情,决定将CXCL8称为白介素(IL-8),这被认为是一种误导性的名称。 CXCL8的三维结构是趋化因子超家族所有成员的标志,并表明,事实上,趋化因子样蛋白已经在CXCL8之前的几年中被鉴定出来。这些包括IP10(CXCL10)(3),LD78(CCL3)(4)和TCA3(5),即人I-309的小鼠直系同源物(CCL1)(6)。但是,直到发现CXCL8以后,它们的趋化性活性仍然不清楚。另外,血小板因子4(CXCL4)(7 – 9

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号