首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Microbiology >Comparing the Ecological Stoichiometry in Green and Brown Food Webs – A Review and Meta-analysis of Freshwater Food Webs
【24h】

Comparing the Ecological Stoichiometry in Green and Brown Food Webs – A Review and Meta-analysis of Freshwater Food Webs

机译:比较绿色和棕色食物网中的生态化学计量学–淡水食物网的回顾和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

The framework of ecological stoichiometry was developed primarily within the context of “green” autotroph-based food webs. While stoichiometric principles also apply in “brown” detritus-based systems, these systems have been historically understudied and differ from green ones in several important aspects including carbon (C) quality and the nutrient [nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P)] contents of food resources for consumers. In this paper, we review work over the last decade that has advanced the application of ecological stoichiometry from green to brown food webs, focusing on freshwater ecosystems. We first review three focal areas where green and brown food webs differ: (1) bottom–up controls by light and nutrient availability, (2) stoichiometric constraints on consumer growth and nutritional regulation, and (3) patterns in consumer-driven nutrient dynamics. Our review highlights the need for further study of how light and nutrient availability affect autotroph–heterotroph interactions on detritus and the subsequent effects on consumer feeding and growth. To complement this conceptual review, we formally quantified differences in stoichiometric principles between green and brown food webs using a meta-analysis across feeding studies of freshwater benthic invertebrates. From 257 datasets collated across 46 publications and several unpublished studies, we compared effect sizes (Pearson’s r) of resource N:C and P:C on growth, consumption, excretion, and egestion between herbivorous and detritivorous consumers. The meta-analysis revealed that both herbivore and detritivore growth are limited by resource N:C and P:C contents, but effect sizes only among detritivores were significantly above zero. Consumption effect sizes were negative among herbivores but positive for detritivores in the case of both N:C and P:C, indicating distinct compensatory feeding responses across resource stoichiometry gradients. Herbivore P excretion rates responded significantly positively to resource P:C, whereas detritivore N and P excretion did not respond; detritivore N and P egestion responded positively to resource N:C and P:C, respectively. Our meta-analysis highlights resource N and P contents as broadly limiting in brown and green benthic food webs, but indicates contrasting mechanisms of limitation owing to differing consumer regulation. We suggest that green and brown food webs share fundamental stoichiometric principles, while identifying specific differences toward applying ecological stoichiometry across ecosystems.
机译:生态化学计量的框架主要是在“绿色”自养型食物网的背景下开发的。虽然化学计量原理也适用于基于“棕色”碎屑的系统,但是这些系统在历史上一直未被研究,并且在一些重要方面与绿色系统不同,包括碳(C)的质量以及养分[氮(N)和磷(P)]的含量消费者的食物资源。在本文中,我们回顾了过去十年中已将生态化学计量学应用从绿色食物网络扩展到棕色食物网的工作,重点是淡水生态系统。我们首先回顾绿色和棕色食物网不同的三个重点领域:(1)由光和养分的可利用性进行的自下而上的控制;(2)消费者增长和营养调节的化学计量约束;(3)消费者驱动的养分动态模式。我们的评论强调需要进一步研究光和养分的供应量如何影响碎屑物的自养-异养相互作用以及随后对消费者摄食和生长的影响。为了补充此概念性综述,我们使用跨淡水底栖无脊椎动物摄食研究的荟萃分析,正式量化了绿色和棕色食物网之间化学计量原理的差异。我们从46个出版物和一些未发表的研究中收集的257个数据集中,比较了N:C和P:C资源对草食性和有害性消费者之间的生长,消费,排泄和放牧的影响大小(Pearson's r)。荟萃分析显示,草食动物和碎屑动物的生长都受资源氮和磷含量的限制,但仅碎屑动物的效应量显着高于零。在食草动物中,消费效应大小为负,但在N:C和P:C情况下,对食用有害动物的影响为正,表明跨资源化学计量梯度的补偿性补料响应不同。草食性P的排泄率对资源P:C显着正响应,而有害的N和P的排泄没有响应。 N和P的有害生物分别对资源N:C和P:C呈积极反应。我们的荟萃分析强调了棕色和绿色底栖食物网中资源氮和磷的含量受到广泛限制,但是由于消费者法规的不同,也表明了限制的对比机制。我们建议绿色和棕色食物网共享基本的化学计量原则,同时确定在整个生态系统中应用生态化学计量的特定差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号