...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Microbiology >Arthrobacter sp. EpRS66 and Arthrobacter sp. EpRS71: Draft Genome Sequences from Two Bacteria Isolated from Echinacea purpurea Rhizospheric Soil
【24h】

Arthrobacter sp. EpRS66 and Arthrobacter sp. EpRS71: Draft Genome Sequences from Two Bacteria Isolated from Echinacea purpurea Rhizospheric Soil

机译:炭疽菌 sp。 EpRS66和 Arthrobacter sp.。 EpRS71:从紫锥菊根际土壤中分离的两个细菌的基因组序列草案

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction One of the most promising, but still overlooked fields of microbiological research is represented by endophytic microorganisms, i.e., those organisms living in the tissues of host plants and/or in their rhizosphere (Rosenblueth and Martínez-Romero, 2006 ; Reinhold-Hurek and Hurek, 2011 ). These microbes are emerging as a new potential source of secondary metabolites and products, for exploitation in medicine, agriculture, and industry.From a biotechnological perspective, a controlled (engineered) colonization of plant's tissues by some bacteria may be desirable because of their ability to produce a variety of plant growth promoting (PGP) molecules, spanning from siderophores, nitrogenases, hormones, and so on. In addition, host-microbe interaction confers indirect advantage to the plant, resulting from the inhibition activity exerted by the associated microbial community toward potential pathogens.Moreover, in the field of medicine, there are examples of very well-known molecules derived by endophytes like antibiotics, antimycotics, and anticancer drugs. Also, it is still unknown if plant-associated bacteria may enhance (or be responsible for) some of the effects exerted by the extracts of medicinal plants (essential oils) (Kloepper and Ryu, 2006 ; Hardoim et al., 2008 ).In this regard, in October 2012, in Casola Valsenio (Italy), a collection of microorganisms was isolated from both internal tissues and the rhizospheric soil of the medicinal plant Echinacea purpurea , as reported in Chiellini et al. ( 2014 ). Among others, two strains sampled from the rhizosphere and belonging to Arthrobacter species were identified, i.e., Arthrobacter sp. EpRS66 and Arthrobacter sp. EpRS71. Based on their antibiotic resistance profile, reported in Mengoni et al. ( 2014 ), and on further tests performed on these two strains, they were selected as good candidates for genome sequencing analysis. The last, will constitute a resource to deeply investigate their genomic features and to perform comparative genomics analysis. Moreover, in the aim of new drugs discovery, the genome sequence will facilitate the identification of putative genes responsible for the production of bioactive compounds. Materials and methods DNA extraction and sequencing Arthrobacter sp. EpRS66 and Arthrobacter sp. EpRS71 strains were inoculated overnight on TSB medium at 30°C. Their genomic DNA was then extracted using the CTAB method (Perrin et al., 2015 ). Furthermore, the authenticity of the genomic DNA was confirmed by 16S RNA gene sequencing.MiSeq sequencing system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) was used to perform the whole genome shot-gun of the two organisms. The method used a 2 × 300 bp paired-end approach, which produced a genome coverage of 246.0 x for Arthrobacter sp. EpRS66 and 91x for Arthrobacter sp. EpRS71. Genome assembly and annotation The quality of the obtained read pairs was evaluated by inspecting them with FastQC software package v. 0.52 (Kunde-Ramamoorthy et al., 2014 ). Poor quality bases were removed with StreamingTrim (Bacci et al., 2014 ). De novo assembly was performed by using SPAdes 3.5 software (Bankevich et al., 2012 ) with a k-mer length of 21, 33, and 55. After, those contigs with length inferior to 2000 bp were trimmed and the remaining (6 and 24 for Arthrobacter sp. EPRS66 and Arthrobacter sp. EPRS71, respectively) were launched in a multi-draft based analysis through MeDuSa scaffolder (Bosi et al., 2015 ), by using as references 5 Arthrobacter genomes retrieved at NCBI database ( Arthrobacter arilaitensis Re117, Arthrobacter FB24, Arthrobacter Rue61a, Arthrobacter aurescens TC1, Arthrobacter chlorophenolicus A6).Automated annotation of the two draft genome sequences has then been performed with NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Results The last version of Arthrobacter sp. EpRS66 genome has a total length of 3,707,708 bp and embeds only 2 scaffolds (L50 equal to 1), with a mean G+C content of 59.27%. The annotation analysis identified a total of 3485 genes, of which 3383 have been annotated as coding DNA sequences (CDS), 29 as pseudogenes, 4 as rRNAs, 68 as tRNAs, and 1 as ncRNA.The draft genome sequence of Arthrobacter sp. EpRS71 24 is 4,849,450 bp long and its contigs are set-up in 10 scaffolds (L50 equal to 1). The G+C content is 61.60%, a value slightly higher than the previous but still perfectly comparable with that of other Arthrobacter genomes sequenced so far. The annotation of Arthrobacter sp. EpRS71 genome revealed the presence of 4515 genes. This total amount includes 4379 proteins coding sequences, 71 pseudogenes, and 62 RNA (6 rRNAs, 55 tRNAs, 1 ncRNA) coding sequences.Both genome sequences have been deposited at NCBI database and are available in both fasta and GenBank format; the GenBank accession number of Arthrobacter sp. EPRS66 is LNUU00000000 and the version reported in this work was named LNUU01000000 ; the GenBank accession number of Arthrobacter sp. EPRS71 is LNUV000000
机译:引言微生物学研究是最有希望但仍被忽视的领域之一,即内生微生物,即生活在寄主植物组织和/或其根际中的那些生物(Rosenblueth和Martínez-Romero,2006; Reinhold-Hurek和Hurek,2011年)。这些微生物正在成为新的潜在的次级代谢产物和产品的潜在来源,可用于医学,农业和工业。从生物技术的角度来看,由于某些细菌能够控制(工程化)植物组织的定殖,因此它们可能是理想的。产生多种植物生长促进(PGP)分子,涵盖铁载体,固氮酶,激素等。此外,由于相关微生物群落对潜在病原体的抑制活性,宿主与微生物之间的相互作用赋予了植物间接的优势。此外,在医学领域,内生菌衍生的非常著名的分子有许多例子,例如抗生素,抗真菌药和抗癌药。同样,植物相关细菌是否可以增强(或负责)药用植物(精油)提取物所发挥的某些作用仍是未知的(Kloepper和Ryu,2006年; Hardoim等人,2008年)。为此,根据Chiellini等人的报道,2012年10月,在意大利Casola Valsenio的药用植物紫锥菊(Echinacea purpurea)的内部组织和根际土壤中均分离出了微生物。 (2014)。其中,鉴定出了从根际取样并属于节杆菌属的两种菌株,即节杆菌属。 EpRS66和节杆菌EpRS71。基于它们的抗生素抗药性,Mengoni等报道。 (2014),并在对这两个菌株进行的进一步测试中,它们被选为基因组测序分析的良好候选者。最后,将构成深入研究其基因组特征并进行比较基因组分析的资源。而且,为了新药的发现,基因组序列将有助于鉴定可能产生生物活性化合物的基因。材料和方法DNA提取和测序节杆菌。 EpRS66和节杆菌将EpRS71菌株在30℃下在TSB培养基上接种过夜。然后使用CTAB方法提取其基因组DNA(Perrin等,2015)。此外,通过16S RNA基因测序证实了基因组DNA的真实性。使用MiSeq测序系统(Illumina Inc.,San Diego,CA)进行了两种生物的全基因组shot弹枪测试。该方法使用了2×300 bp的配对末端方法,对节杆菌属细菌产生了246.0 x的基因组覆盖率。关节杆菌sp的EpRS66和91x。 EpRS71。基因组组装和注释通过使用FastQC软件包v.0.52检查它们对获得的阅读对的质量进行了评估(Kunde-Ramamoorthy等,2014)。使用StreamingTrim删除了质量较差的基准(Bacci等,2014)。使用SPAdes 3.5软件(Bankevich等人,2012)从头组装,k-mer长度分别为21、33和55。之后,剪裁那些长度小于2000 bp的重叠群,其余的重叠群(6和通过MeDuSa支架(Bosi et al。,2015)在多草稿分析中启动了24种针对节杆菌属的细菌EPRS66和EPRS71(Bosi et al。,2015),将在NCBI数据库中检索到的5种关节炎细菌基因组作为参考(阿里氏杆菌Arterobacter arilaitensis Re117) ,Arthrrobacter FB24,Arthrobacter Rue61a,Aurerobacter aurescens TC1,Arthrobacter chlorophenolicus A6),然后使用NCBI原核基因组注释管道对两个基因组序列草案进行自动注释。结果节杆菌sp。的最新版本。 EpRS66基因组的全长为3,707,708 bp,仅嵌入2个支架(L50等于1),平均G + C含量为59.27%。注释分析共鉴定了3485个基因,其中3383个基因已被注释为编码DNA序列(CDS),29个基因为假基因,4个基因为rRNA,68个基因为tRNA,1个基因为ncRNA。 EpRS71 24的长度为4,849,450 bp,其重叠群设置在10个支架中(L50等于1)。 G + C含量为61.60%,比以前的值略高,但仍可与迄今为止测序的其他节杆菌基因组完全媲美。关节杆菌属的注释。 EpRS71基因组揭示了4515个基因的存在。该总数包括4379个蛋白质编码序列,71个假基因和62个RNA(6个rRNA,55个tRNA,1个ncRNA)编码序列。这两个基因组序列均已保存在NCBI数据库中,并且可以用fasta和GenBank格式获得。 GenBank登录号为Arthrobacter sp.。 EPRS66是LNUU00000000,并且在此工作中报告的版本名为LNUU01000000; GenBank登录号为Arthrobacter sp.。 EPRS71是LNUV000000

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号