首页> 外文期刊>Filaria journal >The argument for integrating vector control with multiple drug administration campaigns to ensure elimination of lymphatic filariasis
【24h】

The argument for integrating vector control with multiple drug administration campaigns to ensure elimination of lymphatic filariasis

机译:关于将媒介物控制与多种药物施用活动相结合以确保消除淋巴丝虫病的争论

获取原文
           

摘要

Background There is a danger that mass drug administration campaigns may fail to maintain adequate treatment coverage to achieve lymphatic filariasis elimination. Hence, additional measures to suppress transmission might be needed to ensure the success of the Global Program for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis. Discussion Vector control successfully eliminated lymphatic filariasis when implemented alone or with mass drug administration. Challenges to lymphatic filariasis elimination include uncertainty of the exact level and duration of microfilarial suppression required for elimination, the mobility of infected individuals, consistent non-participation of some infected individuals with mass drug administration, the possible development of anti-filarial drug resistance and treatment strategies in areas co-endemic with loasis. Integration of vector control with mass drug administration can address some of these challenges. The potential benefits of vector control would include: (1) the ability to suppress filariasis transmission without the need to identify all individual 'foci of infection'; (2) minimizing the risk of reestablishment of transmission from imported microfilaria positive individuals; and (3) decreasing the risk of dengue or malaria transmission where, respectively, Aedes or Anopheles are lymphatic filariasis vectors. Summary With adequate sustained treatment coverage, mass drug administration should meet the criteria for elimination of lymphatic filariasis. However, it may be difficult to sustain sufficiently high mass drug administration coverage to achieve lymphatic filariasis elimination in some areas, particularly, where Aedes species are the vectors. Since vector control was effective in controlling and even eliminating lymphatic filariasis transmission, integration of vector control with mass drug administration will ensure the sustainability of transmission suppression and thereby better ensure the success of national filariasis elimination programs. Although trials of some vector control interventions are needed, proven vector control strategies are ready for immediate integration with mass drug administration for many important vectors. Vector control is the only presently available additional lymphatic filariasis control measure with the potential for immediate implementation.
机译:背景技术大规模药物管理运动可能无法维持足够的治疗覆盖范围以消除淋巴丝虫病。因此,可能需要采取其他措施来抑制传播,以确保《全球消除淋巴丝虫病方案》取得成功。讨论当单独或与大量药物一起施用时,载体控制成功消除了淋巴丝虫病。消除淋巴丝虫病的挑战包括消除消灭丝虫病的确切水平和持续时间的不确定性,受感染个体的活动能力,某些受感染个体在大规模药物管理下持续不参与,可能产生的抗丝虫耐药性和治疗与松散流行地区的策略。将媒介物控制与大规模药物管理相结合可以解决其中一些挑战。病媒控制的潜在好处包括:(1)抑制丝虫病传播的能力,而无需确定所有个体“感染病灶”; (2)最大限度地减少从输入的微丝individuals阳性个体中重新传播的风险; (3)降低登革热或疟疾传播的风险,其中伊蚊或按蚊是淋巴丝虫病的载体。小结在有足够的持续治疗覆盖率的情况下,大规模给药应符合消除淋巴丝虫病的标准。但是,在某些地区,尤其是在伊蚊物种为载体的地区,可能难以维持足够高的药物给药覆盖范围,以消除淋巴丝虫病。由于病媒控制在控制甚至消除淋巴丝虫病传播方面是有效的,因此病媒控制与大规模药物管理相结合将确保传播抑制的可持续性,从而更好地确保国家消除丝虫病计划的成功。尽管需要对某些媒介控制干预措施进行试验,但已证明行之有效的媒介控制策略已准备就绪,可以与许多重要媒介的大规模药物管理立即整合。病媒控制是目前唯一有可能立即实施的额外的淋巴丝虫病控制措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号