...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence Based Library and Information Practice >Summon, EBSCO Discovery Service, and Google Scholar: A Comparison of Search Performance Using User Queries
【24h】

Summon, EBSCO Discovery Service, and Google Scholar: A Comparison of Search Performance Using User Queries

机译:Summon,EBSCO发现服务和Google Scholar:使用用户查询的搜索效果比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives - To evaluate and compare the results produced by Summon and EBSCO Discovery Service (EDS) for the types of searches typically performed by library users at North Carolina State University. Also, to compare the performance of these products to Google Scholar for the same types of searches. Methods - A study was conducted to compare the search performance of two web-scale discovery services: ProQuest’s Summon and EBSCO Discovery Service (EDS). The performance of these services was also compared to Google Scholar. A sample of 183 actual user searches, randomly selected from the NCSU Libraries’ 2013 Summon search logs, was used for the study. For each query, searches were performed in Summon, EDS, and Google Scholar. The results of known-item searches were compared for retrieval of the known item, and the top ten results of topical searches were compared for the number of relevant results. Results - There was no significant difference in the results between Summon and EDS for either known-item or topical searches. There was also no significant difference between the performance of the two discovery services and Google Scholar for known-item searches. However, Google Scholar outperformed both discovery services for topical searches. Conclusions - There was no significant difference in the relevance of search results between Summon and EDS. Thus, any decision to purchase one of those products over the other should be based upon other considerations (e.g., technical issues, cost, customer service, or user interface).
机译:目标-评估和比较Summon和EBSCO发现服务(EDS)针对北卡罗来纳州立大学图书馆用户通常进行的搜索类型产生的结果。另外,在相同类型的搜索中,可以将这些产品的性能与Google学术搜索进行比较。方法-进行了一项研究,以比较两种网络级发现服务:ProQuest的Summon和EBSCO发现服务(EDS)的搜索效果。这些服务的性能也与Google学术搜索进行了比较。该研究使用了从NCSU图书馆的2013年Summon搜索日志中随机选择的183个实际用户搜索样本。对于每个查询,在Summon,EDS和Google Scholar中进行搜索。比较已知项目搜索的结果以检索已知项,并比较主题搜索的前十个结果以获取相关结果的数量。结果-对于已知项目或主题搜索,“召唤”和EDS之间的结果没有显着差异。两种发现服务的性能与Google Scholar对已知项搜索的性能也没有显着差异。但是,对于主题搜索,Google Scholar的性能优于这两种发现服务。结论-Summon和EDS之间搜索结果的相关性没有显着差异。因此,决定购买那些产品中的一种而不是另一种的决定应基于其他考虑因素(例如,技术问题,成本,客户服务或用户界面)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号