...
首页> 外文期刊>Food and nutrition bulletin >The Role of Dairy in Effectiveness and Cost of Treatment of Children With Moderate Acute Malnutrition
【24h】

The Role of Dairy in Effectiveness and Cost of Treatment of Children With Moderate Acute Malnutrition

机译:乳制品在中度急性营养不良儿童的疗效和治疗费用中的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Dairy is recommended in specially formulated supplementary foods to treat children with moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) but with limited evidence and added cost. Review studies of ready-to-use foods (RUFs) versus fortified blended foods (FBFs) to determine whether inclusion of dairy modifies the comparative effectiveness and cost. We reviewed literature comparing FBF and RUF in treatment of MAM among children younger than 5 years in developing countries. Outcomes of recovery from MAM, weight, and length gain were compared among treatment categories: FBF with dairy (FBF+), FBF without dairy (FBF?), RUF with dairy (RUF+), and RUF without dairy (RUF?). Supplement cost was compared per 500 kcal. Eight studies were included. Rations were heterogeneous in energy and type of dairy. Overall, RUF+, RUF?, and FBF+ performed similarly, with higher recovery and weight gain compared with FBF?. RUF+ had higher recovery (in 5 of 6 comparisons), weight gain (4 of 4), and length gain (1 of 4) versus FBF?. The RUF+ had higher recovery (1 of 2) versus FBF+, with no other differences. The RUF? versus FBF+ had no differences (0 of 2). The RUF? had higher recovery (1 of 2), weight gain (2 of 2) versus FBF?. Four studies reported supplement costs, which averaged US$0.15 (FBF?), US$0.18 (FBF+), US$0.18 (RUF?), and US$0.37 (RUF+) per 500 kcal. There is a consistent benefit of FBF that include dairy in treatment of children with MAM. Benefits of dairy in RUF require further investigation. Evidence from rigorous quantitative analysis of existing data, cost-effectiveness, and prospective trials will be essential in determining policy on treatment for children with MAM.
机译:建议在特别配制的辅助食品中使用乳制品来治疗中度急性营养不良(MAM)的儿童,但证据有限且成本较高。回顾现成食品(RUFs)与强化混合食品(FBFs)的研究,以确定乳制品的添加是否会改变比较效果和成本。我们回顾了比较FBF和RUF治疗发展中国家5岁以下儿童MAM的文献。在以下治疗类别中比较了从MAM,体重和体长增加中恢复的结果:带乳制品的FBF(FBF +),不带乳制品的FBF(FBF?),带乳制品的RUF(RUF +)和无乳制品的RUF(RUF?)。比较每500大卡的补充成本。包括八项研究。定量在能量和乳制品类型上是异质的。总的来说,RUF +,RUF 2和FBF +表现相似,与FBF 2相比具有更高的恢复率和体重增加。与UFF 2相比,RUF +具有较高的恢复率(在6个比较中的5个中),体重增加(4个中的4个)和长度增加(4个中的1个)。与FBF +相比,RUF +具有更高的恢复率(1/2),没有其他差异。联阵?与FBF +的比较无差异(0/2)。联阵?与FBF 2相比,具有较高的恢复率(1/2),体重增加(2/2)。四项研究报告的补充成本每500大卡平均为0.15美元(FBF?),0.18美元(FBF +),0.18美元(RUF?)和0.37美元(RUF +)。 FBF具有持续的益处,其中包括乳品治疗MAM儿童。联阵中乳制品的好处需要进一步调查。对现有数据,成本效益和前瞻性试验进行严格的定量分析,对于确定MAM儿童治疗政策至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号