首页> 外文期刊>Fire Ecology >Personal Perspectives on Commercial versus Communal African Fire Paradigms when Using Fire to Manage Rangelands for Domestic Livestock and Wildlife in Southern and East African Ecosystems
【24h】

Personal Perspectives on Commercial versus Communal African Fire Paradigms when Using Fire to Manage Rangelands for Domestic Livestock and Wildlife in Southern and East African Ecosystems

机译:在南部和东部非洲生态系统中使用火来管理牧场以供家畜和野生动物使用时,对非洲商业与公共火范式的个人看法

获取原文
           

摘要

Africa is often referred to as the Fire Continent, and fire is recognised as a natural factor of the environment due to the prevalence of lightning storms and an ideal fire climate in the less arid regions with seasonal drought. On a global scale, the most extensive areas of tropical savanna, characterized by grassy under stories that become extremely flammable during the dry season, occur in Africa. The use of fire in Africa to manage vegetation for domestic livestock and indigenous wildlife is widely recognized by both commercial and communal land users. Research on the effects of fire has been conducted throughout the grassland and savanna areas since the early twentieth century, resulting in the development of effective and practical guidelines for prescribed burning for domestic livestock and wildlife management systems. Generally, the reasons for prescribed burning in Africa are similar for both commercial and communal land users, namely, to remove moribund and or unacceptable plant material and to control the encroachment of undesirable plants negatively affecting domestic livestock and wildlife. In addition, commercial operators use fire to manage wildlife conservation areas. Prescribed burning to control ticks is also widely used in communal communities but is generally not recognised in commercial livestock enterprises. However, research has shown that tick populations can be reduced using fire to alter the micro-habitat for these organisms. Until recently, commercial and communal land users held differing views on the appropriate season for prescribed burning, with the former igniting fires shortly after the first spring rains and the latter burning throughout the dry winter period. Subsequent research has shown that both seasons of burn have similar effects; the key requirement being that the grass sward is dormant at the time of burning to minimise the negative effects on the vegetation. A valuable tentative comparison has been made between fire management practices applied by commercial land users and communal land users, and provides an exciting opportunity for further and essential research to be conducted to gain greater insight into how communal African communities use fire. Based on extensive experience, my aim is to provide a personal perspective on the use of fire by commercial and communal land users for managing rangelands in southern and east African regions of the continent.
机译:非洲通常被称为“大火大陆”,由于雷暴的流行和季节性干旱的干旱地区的理想火情,大火被认为是环境的自然因素。在全球范围内,非洲大草原是热带稀树草原的最广泛地区,其特征是草皮下的故事在干旱季节变得极易燃。商业和公共土地使用者都广泛认识到在非洲使用火来管理家畜和土著野生动植物的植被。自20世纪初以来,已经在整个草原和热带稀树草原地区进行了关于火势影响的研究,从而为家畜和野生动植物管理系统制定了针对指定燃烧的有效和实用指南。通常,在非洲,对商业和公共土地使用者进行规定性焚烧的原因是相似的,即,去除垂死的和/或不可接受的植物材料,并控制对不良影响的家畜和野生动植物的侵害。此外,商业经营者使用火来管理野生动植物保护区。规定的燃烧控制control虫也广泛用于社区,但在商业畜牧企业中通常不被认可。但是,研究表明,使用火来改变这些生物的微生境可以减少tick的数量。直到最近,商业和公共土地使用者对适当的规定燃烧季节仍持不同意见,前者在第一次春雨后不久就点燃了大火,而后者在整个干燥的冬天都在燃烧。随后的研究表明,两个烧伤季节都有相似的效果;关键要求是草皮在燃烧时处于休眠状态,以最大程度地减少对植被的负面影响。在商业土地使用者和公共土地使用者所采用的消防管理实践之间进行了一次有价值的初步比较,这为进行进一步的重要研究提供了令人振奋的机会,以深入了解非洲社区如何使用火。基于丰富的经验,我的目的是就商业和公共土地使用者使用火烧来管理非洲南部和东部非洲地区的牧场提供个人观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号