首页> 外文期刊>Food and Energy Security >Ecological, economic, and environmental assessments of integrated pest management in potato: A case study from the Ca?ete Valley, Peru
【24h】

Ecological, economic, and environmental assessments of integrated pest management in potato: A case study from the Ca?ete Valley, Peru

机译:马铃薯病虫害综合治理的生态,经济和环境评估:以秘鲁卡埃特谷为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Integrated pest management (IPM) versus farmers’ pest management practices were evaluated in potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) in the central coast of Peru. IPM technologies consisted of seed treatment, insect pest, and disease scouting using action thresholds for decision making to apply pesticides, and the use of trapping devices and selective insecticides versus chemical control by potato farmers. An ecological, environmental, and economic analysis of both approaches was carried out by using biodiversity indices, environmental impact indicators, and partial budget analysis. The leafminer fly Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard) and the bud midge Prodiplosis longifila (Gagne) were the most important pests during the cropping season. Larval infestation of both pests and leafminer foliar damage were less in IPM plots. Almost twice as many pesticide (insecticide and fungicide) applications per season were carried out on farmers’ practices plots with 16.7 sprayings compared to 9.7 sprayings in IPM plots. The total quantity of pesticides used per season was higher under farmers’ practices (4,614.3?g?a.i./ha) than in IPM (2,042.6?g?a.i./ha) plots. Likewise, farmers applied five times more insecticides (3,620.3?g?a.i./ha) than IPM (722.55?g?a.i./ha). Methamidophos and chlorpyrifos accounted for 65% of the environmental impact (EI) value of 137/ha in farmers’ fields. IPM strategies reduced the EI to 42.4/ha, which represents a reduction of 69.2%. Further, IPM achieved 35% higher marketable potato yield than farmers’ practices. Partial budget analysis showed a higher net profit in all IPM plots, with an average increase of US$1,410/ha. The field trials demonstrated the environmental and economic viability of IPM for potato in the central coast of Peru. However, while there are effective integrated components for leafminer fly management, there is a clear need to develop and integrate more sustainable and ecological pest management strategies for other economically important pests such as the bud midge.
机译:在秘鲁中部沿海地区的马铃薯(Solanum tuberosum L.)中评估了综合虫害管理(IPM)与农民虫害管理实践的对比。 IPM技术包括种子处理,虫害和使用行动阈值进行农药应用决策的疾病筛选,以及使用诱捕装置和选择性杀虫剂以及马铃薯种植者的化学控制。通过使用生物多样性指数,环境影响指标和部分预算分析,对这两种方法进行了生态,环境和经济分析。在播种季节,min叶蝇Liriomyza huidobrensis(Blanchard)和芽midProdiplosis longifila(Gagne)是最重要的害虫。在IPM样地中,害虫的幼虫侵害和minerminer叶面损害较少。在农民的实践地块,每季施用的农药(杀虫剂和杀真菌剂)几乎是以前的两倍,喷洒量为16.7次,而IPM地块为9.7次。根据农民的实践,每季使用的农药总量(4,614.3?g?a.i./ha)高于IPM(2,042.6?g?a.i./ha)地块。同样,农民施用的杀虫剂(3,620.3 g.a.i./ha)是IPM(722.55 gg.a.i./ha)的五倍。甲胺磷和毒死rif占农民耕地137 / ha的环境影响(EI)值的65%。 IPM策略将EI降低至42.4 / ha,这意味着减少了69.2%。此外,IPM的可销售马铃薯产量比农民的实践高35%。部分预算分析显示,所有IPM地块的净利润均较高,平均每公顷增加1,410美元。现场试验证明了IPM在秘鲁中部沿海地区马铃薯的环境和经济可行性。但是,尽管有有效的整合方法可用于leaf叶蝇的管理,但显然需要针对其他经济上重要的害虫(例如芽bud)开发和整合更可持续的生态害虫管理策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号