首页> 外文期刊>Geohealth >Emission factors of health‐ and climate‐relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon‐finance‐approved cookstove intervention in rural India
【24h】

Emission factors of health‐ and climate‐relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon‐finance‐approved cookstove intervention in rural India

机译:在印度农村地区通过碳融资批准的炉灶干预期间在家中测量的与健康和气候相关的污染物的排放因子

获取原文
       

摘要

We present results of an emission characterization effort, completed as part of a larger intervention trial, of a carbon‐finance‐approved program replacing traditional cookstoves with “rocket”‐style natural draft stoves. The 100 emission tests were conducted across 31 households in control and intervention groups, with repeated tests in most households during preintervention and postintervention periods. While mean fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emission factor for intervention stoves was significantly lower than for traditional stoves in baseline measurements, they were only marginally lower than traditional stoves during follow‐up. Intervention stove PM2.5 emissions had a larger contribution from light‐absorbing (elemental) carbon than traditional stoves. Repeated measurements in control households provide evidence for strong seasonality, likely due to differences in fuel moisture/types, in traditional stove emissions, with important implications for study design. Seasonality observed in control household emission factors (baseline > follow‐up) was in the opposite direction as that observed in indoor PM2.5 concentrations (baseline < follow‐up), highlighting that seasonally varying conditions (e.g., ventilation rates) may modify the link between emissions and exposures. Emission factor differences in paired (pre/post) tests from the same households were similar to differences in the medians of entire groups, suggesting variability is dominated by test‐to‐test variation. Emission reductions from intervention stoves were significantly smaller than laboratory performance would suggest or that are required to strongly reduce exposures. Field emissions assessment like that presented here should be prioritized early in technology assessment and development to provide rigorous estimates of the benefits reasonably expected from interventions with the potential for substantial benefits to human health and the environment.
机译:我们介绍了一项排放表征工作的结果,该结果是一项较大的干预试验的一部分,该结果是碳融资批准的计划的一部分,该计划用“火箭”式自然通风炉代替了传统的灶具。在对照组和干预组中的31个家庭中进行了100项排放测试,在干预前和干预后的大部分家庭中都进行了重复测试。在基线测量中,干预炉的平均细颗粒物(PM2.5)排放因子显着低于传统炉,但在随访期间仅稍低于传统炉。介入炉具PM2.5的排放比传统炉具对光吸收(元素)碳的贡献更大。对照家庭中的重复测量提供了强有力的季节性证据,这很可能是由于传统炉灶排放中的燃油水分/类型不同造成的,这对研究设计具有重要意义。在对照家庭排放因子(基线>随访)中观察到的季节性与在室内PM2.5浓度(基线<随访)中观察到的季节性相反,这表明季节性变化的条件(例如通风率)可能会改变排放与暴露之间的联系。来自同一家庭的配对(前/后)测试中的排放因子差异与整个组中位数的差异相似,表明变异性受测试差异的影响。干预炉的减排量远小于实验室的建议或强烈减少暴露所需的减排量。像此处介绍的那样,现场排放评估应在技术评估和开发的早期进行优先处理,以对干预措施合理预期的效益提供严格的估计,并可能对人类健康和环境带来实质性的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号