...
首页> 外文期刊>Guttmacher Policy Review >Principles for Reform: New U.S. Health Care Proposals Cannot Overlook Sexual and Reproductive Health
【24h】

Principles for Reform: New U.S. Health Care Proposals Cannot Overlook Sexual and Reproductive Health

机译:改革原则:新的美国医疗保健建议不能忽视性健康和生殖健康

获取原文

摘要

Federal and state policymakers and advocates continue to debate what the future of the U.S. health care system will look like. Nearly a decade after it was enacted, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) remains under attack by conservative policymakers and in the courts. Meanwhile, progressive policymakers and advocates are eager to build on or even replace the ACA in order to address problems such as persistent coverage gaps and high out-of-pocket costs for patients. One approach would be incremental, such as establishing a “public option” to allow people to “buy in” to a publicly funded program like Medicaid or Medicare as a form of competition with private insurance plans. The second main approach would be a comprehensive overhaul of the existing health care system; some versions of this approach, often described as “Medicare for All,” would move most or all U.S. residents to government-run coverage. Whatever approach policymakers take, it is imperative that they fully address the wide array of sexual and reproductive health needs. The continued political and legal fights over the ACA have demonstrated that social conservatives will take every opportunity to undermine provisions that protect and promote sexual and reproductive health and rights. 1,2 The best defense against such attacks is specific and detailed statutory language, which can help guide implementation and is more difficult to undermine or reinterpret through federal or state agency regulations and guidance. To develop effective statutory language, policymakers will need a roadmap—a clear set of specific principles for how to ensure that everyone has comprehensive coverage for sexual and reproductive health services; has unrestricted access to a robust network of providers; and can rely on a wide array of patient protections (see figure 1).
机译:联邦和州的政策制定者和倡导者继续辩论美国医疗保健系统的未来。颁布近十年后,《平价医疗法案》(ACA)仍受到保守派决策者和法院的攻击。同时,进步的政策制定者和倡导者们渴望建立或什至取代ACA,以解决诸如持续存在的医疗服务缺口和患者自付费用之类的问题。一种方法是渐进式的,例如建立“公共选项”,以允许人们“购买”医疗补助或医疗保险等公共资助的计划,这是与私人保险计划竞争的一种形式。第二种主要方法是全面改革现有的卫生保健系统;这种方法的某些版本(通常称为“全民医疗保险”)会将大多数或所有美国居民转移到政府经营的保险范围内。无论政策制定者采取什么方法,当务之急是要充分满足广泛的性健康和生殖健康需求。关于ACA的持续政治和法律斗争表明,社会保守派将抓住一切机会破坏保护和促进性健康和生殖健康与权利的规定。 1,2针对此类攻击的最佳防御方法是使用特定而详细的法定语言,这可以帮助指导实施,并且更难通过联邦或州机构的法规和指南来破坏或重新解释。为了发展有效的法定语言,政策制定者将需要一个路线图,即一套明确的具体原则,以确保每个人都能全面享受性健康和生殖健康服务;不受限制地访问强大的提供商网络;并且可以依靠各种各样的患者保护措施(见图1)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号